Search found 45 matches

Return

Help Required

I realise this is not Cubase related - but I figured posting here would help maximise exposure.

http://www.kvraudio.com/focus/something-important-24298
by wodehouse
Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:09 am
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Blank GUI Central

whenever i start having similar issues, i would blame RAM usage getting too high. i've tried looking up which dll's use up the most memory, and bridging those with jbridge as separate processes in memory, and i've had some success doing that..

Thanks, Lukas.

Yes, the problem is indeed due to RAM usage getting too high.

Yeah, I'm almost certain J-Bridging would stave off the issue for a while.

I might consider it, after all. Not sure yet.

Can you use J-Bridge with 64-bit versions of the plugins? If so, I might try it.


Yes, you can.
by lukasbrooklyn
Sat Feb 21, 2015 1:15 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Set Definition from Tempo Confusion

I'm trying to drop a reference song (at about 127 bpm) into my 125 bpm project.

I want the reference song to be tempo adjusted and locked to the 125 bpm project.

I followed Greg Ondo's excellent tutorial on it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c13UP4lrYkg

1) Select the reference song track and choose Project -> Tempo Detection...
2) Change time signature from its default set 1/4 to 4/4.
3) Select the track and choose Audio -> Advanced -> Set Definition from Tempo...

Now Cubase changes its tempo to match the Tempo Track based on the variations in the reference song.

Great.

Now to have it do the opposite, warp the reference song to match a fixed tempo, I should only have to remove the data on the Tempo Track, or deactivate the Tempo Track. Right?

So I do that.

Either way, while the reference song now does indeed lock to the fixed tempo as it should, the rest of my tracks are somehow offbeat, not looping correctly, etc.

How is this possible?

This doesn't make sense because the tempo, at this point, is fixed and is the same tempo as when they were playing back fine. Some tracks, like MIDI drum machines, seem to play back the same as they did before the Set Def. from Tempo, but other VSTi's (some frozen, some not) do not play like they originally did.

Again, same fixed tempo as before I started all this. So nothing, for them, should have changed, right?

Only that one reference song that I applied the Set Def. from Tempo on should be affected by all this, correct?

Hi Jalcide - Not in front of DAW, and didn't watch vid, but may be helpful to a) put all MIDI tracks in linear time base (the clock icon, rather than the yellow/orange quarter note icon), and to make sure all the OTHER audio tracks are not set to Musical Mode.

(PS Would consider working on a dummy renamed version of the project, sometimes it gets too crazy to get back to where you started if things don't go right!)
by alexis
Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:58 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: What is the difference between Group and FX tracks?

Basically the same, except:
a) An insert can be specified during creation of an FX track.
b) The channel is named with the chosen insert effect.
c) FX are added to the FX folder when created.
d) Groups are added to the Group folder when created.
c) They are classed differently for visibility in mixconsoles. For example, you can show/hide ALL the FX channels separately from the group channels, and vice versa.

If these differences don't mean much to you, because you name all tracks explicitly and you put your group/FX tracks in different places according to your visual routing association needs, you will probably be able to forget about using FX, in favour of using only groups. That way, you can build up a routing hierarchy and just insert FX in whichever group suits your purpose.
by Patanjali
Wed Dec 03, 2014 6:25 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Still no bezier curves in automation!!!!!

All joking aside, this -is- a drag. Like it or not, the world has gone EDM and if you do electronica of any kind you GOTTA be able to -easily- and -precisely- draw complex patterns.

I've been struggling (literally) for months with a vocoder effect in Reaktor where I want to modulate a formant filter to make various 'syllables' really POP on certain bars/beats.

What I -want- should be easy as pie: imagine a sine wave pattern that is itself modulated by a square wave.

Now... try -drawing- that in Cubase. Can it be done? Sure. You can also break out of Shawshank in 19 years.

Electronica lives and dies by creating complex automation like this and without precise drawing tools it's a total pain. You can have all the new synths in the world, but good automation is what makes it -interesting-.
by suntower
Fri Dec 05, 2014 8:55 am
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Still no bezier curves in automation!!!!!

Agreed, we need more automation curves.

But instead steinberg has given EDM producers DJ- EQ and Loopmash, which shows they have no clue what EDM producers need :lol:
by patcub
Fri Dec 05, 2014 9:34 am
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

16 inserts per track

What is with keeping to 8 inserts, it's like insisting on wearing flared trousers in the 80's.

Please get a grip and at the very least add two more, be brave and allow 12 or go all out modern and give us 16.

Seriously 8 inserts is completely backward, disrupts workflow and is not a technical limit and would probably take 5 mins to re-code.

This should be in the next minor release version!

Treat us like professionals!
by ControlX2012
Thu Dec 04, 2014 10:27 am
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: 4 significant Cubase 8 issues I'm seeing

My only gripe is that the new font means that the thinnest track height available is now considerably wider. This definitely needs addressing if it's the case (could be wrong), I'll be experimenting more later.

The new font is excessively large and bold. The font style itself looks like something from a comic book rather than what you would find in professional software.
by Greg Houston
Fri Dec 05, 2014 9:18 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: CMC not fully supported in Cubase 8 !!

I just tested in 7.5 and it functions the exact same way: Arrange window needs focus.

May I humbly suggest, in good fairness, that you consider putting a [Solved] in front of the title. :)

Let's save our CMC abandonment anxiety wrath (for now) and hope that by the time our pitchforks and torches and sharpened and lit, we'll be on Cubase Pro 22, where the preferred method of input is holographic gesture and thought-control. :lol:

Granted. I'll check this later and place [Solved] in title for now. I don't recall it ever not working as expected in 7.5, but if it's good for you guys then I'm very grateful for the heads-up.

I wander if this is the same reason for the similar issue in this topic ?

http://www.steinberg.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=230&t=69728

Freddie - all the lighting looks fine to me.
Hope that helps.

On the thought control, I hope any neighbours don't have 'louder' thoughts than us. The interference is bound to be an issue :-)

You are right though. I'm just deeply deeply upset that Steinberg dropped these units exactly at the point I bought into them and 'realised' they were genius ! I'm now terrifed of getting really fluent with them and then losing functionality. It's a real shame. I recommended them to countless studios and colleagues. Having sets of controls I can litter around the studio where I want them without having to have them all stuck together in one big ugly unit is a Godsend.

Please bring them back into the fold Steiny. They really are brilliant !
by Potential - o- meter
Sat Dec 06, 2014 5:44 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Bug? Or Designed by Mephistopheles?

^^ 100 times this.
by MickGael
Sun Dec 07, 2014 12:23 am
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Minimize Bug? Or Designed by Mephistopheles?

You are right: title edited. :D
by MickGael
Sun Dec 07, 2014 12:39 am
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: UI: Consistency

Harshness in the criticism - like in this post - is the main reason why it's hard to get Steinberg to notice any posts. Think about it.
by sonic74
Tue Dec 09, 2014 5:11 am
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Minimize Bug? Or Designed by Mephistopheles?

Hi there,

yes, this issue will be fixed on the first maintenance update. It probably won't be 100% perfect yet, but it will behave much better than it does now. We are preparing a quick fix for some of the most urgent issues for you to have ASAP, but the improvements will continue throughout the whole Cubase 8.0 life cycle.

Stay tuned!

Regards
by Luis Dongo
Tue Dec 09, 2014 2:21 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Does SB Understand Customers' Needs for VSTi MIDI Sends?

OK, it appears (and happily so) that one can render-in-place MIDI parts in MIDI tracks, not just MIDI parts of instrument tracks as is stated in the documentation. This is demonstrated in an SB video (thanks, Mr. Ondo) here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WHRWaufmoU&index=3&list=UUAv0mI6kHe7uqohgOiS2lQg

That'll teach me to read (and believe) the documentation!

That said, there's still a compelling case to be made for MIDI sends in instrument tracks.
by dmbaer
Wed Dec 10, 2014 10:52 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: UI: Consistency

+1

I don't mean this in an aggressive way at all, but Pro Tools 11 gets more and more attractive from a GUI perspective (it's very professional-looking and very consistent, with just as many functions), as Cubase gets more fuzzy and inconsistent and illegible.
by Headlands
Wed Dec 10, 2014 8:39 am
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Heres How get rid of the glow fonts in aero

To disable the glow on a Win7 Pro in Control Panel >System>Advanced System Settings > Performance > Settings > Visual Effects >Use drop shadows for icon labels on the desktop.

It may switch back to classic on clicking, simple un-cklick it and reselect your saved (minimalistic) areo theme.

Don't forget to turn off transparency and in the customize windows look and feel box, also set your desktop to a dark colour, (or any of your choice) but, loads of colour pictures etc as a desktop do take up CPU cycles to maintain in the backround. click on all the borders and ensure there are not two col ours bleeding in any of the options, If there is just set colour 1 and 2 to the same.

Click and apply and there you have, no glowing fonts in areo!

Hope this of help to people like me who don't like the glowing fonts!
by Outsounder
Thu Dec 11, 2014 4:02 am
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: ASIO Guard 2 Hiccups, Loud Stuttering Noise, Reboot Requ

Maybe it's a particular plugin... Test it by disabling thru your plugin manager the Asio Guard for the single vst.
by lordadb
Thu Dec 11, 2014 9:59 am
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Declutter/Clarify Mix Console Channel Selection Hitarea

I agree for the most part.

But for this:
Or I click in the Fader area, forgetting that for some reason it doesn't select the channel either, but instead moves the fader (with no Undo!), even though the fader, itself, wasn't clicked on.
It may help to set the Fader behaviour from, Jump to Touch, in the Preferences (should be the default, but for some strange reason, isn't).
Then you can click in the fader area.

PS. The first thing I do for every Cubase/Nuendo installation ;)

Hope this helps a tiny bit :)
by TSR
Thu Dec 11, 2014 5:31 am
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Minimize Bug? Or Designed by Mephistopheles?

If you had asked me before the release of Cubase 8 if it was possible to make windows management in Cubase on the Windows platform even worse, I would have said that it couldn't be done. Well, I was wrong. Steinberg has managed to make the program even more cumbersome, inconsistent, and counter-intuitive (at least in terms of the UI). Well done, Steinberg.

Couldn't have said it better myself. I got a warning from the board Admin for posting something similar... he objected to my use of the term 'bug'... but what else can you call this?
It's not a bug, it's a feature. :)
Seriously though, Steinberg's made the quirkiest window management and menu bar I've seen, ever.
I like a lot of the new features, like VCA's (a feature I requested years ago), but the window management should never have been released in the state that it's in. If I wanted to be a beta tester I would have applied for it, not paid for it. :)
by Shortstop
Wed Dec 17, 2014 1:57 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Poll: How many actually use the Cubase EQs?

I am wondering this because, as a rule, I swore off Cubase EQs as soon as UAD came out in 2000 (or '99, or whenever), because, back in the day-with Cubase VST 4 and 5-the EQs and reverbs, etc. were so universally despised, and UAD was clearly so superior, so I just switched and never looked back.

But lately, with Cubase having gone through so many obvious improvements I am now wondering if the EQ section deserves another look from me (I have already changed my tune with Steinberg's reverbs: Reverence is beautifully sounding IMO.)

So, I'm wondering what everyone else out there does? Who uses what?
by FunkyMunky
Tue Dec 23, 2014 4:35 am
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Appealing to Steinberg to keep the CMC current viable?

Do threads which express the desire to keep something such as the CMC series viable have any chance of making a difference? I hesitate to make this such a thread because if only 10 or twenty people give the thumbs up, that would probably kill any opportunity for continued product support.....


Oh well, thumbs up here at least...........
by electrow
Thu Mar 27, 2014 3:33 am
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: update or replace motherboard?

thank you for your help guy's..
by shadowfax
Tue Dec 23, 2014 11:00 am
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

What is threshold to trigger a clone?

I know to back up (create those proprietary files in Paragon) after every session.

But what are people's thoughts on how much it should take to trigger making a bit-for-bit clone? For example, before each weekly Windows update? Before installing a new UAD plug-in? Every 'X' days just because?

Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
by alexis
Mon Dec 29, 2014 2:24 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Cubase8.exe Still Running After Quit, Multiple Times

Try turning your soundcard off and on again. Sometimes the driver doesn't release the cubase process...

It happens to me all the time. In case of a crash or a failure to exit the program, turning it off and on again, fixes it all!
by MaXxive
Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:33 am
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Cubase 8 Pro was not ready for public release

I concur.

Whilst I'm loving a lot of new features, the fact it crashes every time I try and bounce anything made in the previous version is beyond annoying. I'd had no issues with previous updates, and only installed as was supposed to be having a bit of a break over xmas, but I'm in the middle of finishing demos for an album, and was really excited about finishing it with some of the new tricks in Cubase 8, but it's become apparent that's highly unlikely.

I may have to try the fresh install idea, but considering my machine has only ever had Cubase, Ableton, Soundforge and Audiomulch installed on it, with no internet connection, it's one of the most basic setups I've seen, without years of messed up registry to complicate matters, I'm not convinced that would help as much.

I've established that big projects run better if I load a small cubase file first. The makers of my PC have also suggested that a lot of issues are in the graphics card, (Steinberg have really stitched people up by making something far more suited to an unreleased OS), and recommended upgrading the graphics cards to something like the new AMD Radeon R7 (min 260 version), but I've seen people with similar cards complaining that they could only gain a stable system by removing these cards and just using basic graphics from the motherboard.

Would definitely be interested in peoples thoughts on this. I want to love this software so much, but when your management and label are telling you to go back to the older version cause you're *quiz* off 24/7 and haven't submitted any music for a month, there's definitely something up!
by Phaeleh
Sat Jan 10, 2015 12:23 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Cubase 8 Pro was not ready for public release

All the early buyers just have a software form of G.A.S. ( Gear Acquisition Syndrome ) :)
by Paul Bryce
Sun Jan 11, 2015 3:09 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: At my wits end with vst performance...please help guys

@Jalcide,

Presumably, tuning ASIO Guard off will disable the dual buffer setup, and put everything on an equal basis?

If so, if what you write is true, the issue should disappear. Of course, capacity might be reduced.
by Patanjali
Sat Jan 17, 2015 5:36 am
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Cubase Caught Red-handed

Sounds like this should be set to music..........Oh but you can't.
by silhouette
Sat Jan 17, 2015 1:02 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Cubase Caught Red-handed

silouette rofl .. btw do you have a paper towel to clean the coffee off i spewed on my computer screen?
thanx for the great humour first thing on a saturday morning. starting the day with a howl is a great thing

cheers
by DLearyUS
Sat Jan 17, 2015 3:06 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: [BON-7409]Cubase 8.0 Render In Place crash

Hello,

We seem to have a breakthrough regarding this bug.
The Channel name will be used as the name for the rendered file. VEP uses slashes "/" (e.g. "Outputs 3/4") which lead to invalid filenames and the crash happens when writing to a non-exisiting file.
With channels without / or other weird characters Cubase Pro 8 doesn't crash.

Best regards,
GN
by Guillermo
Tue Jan 20, 2015 5:12 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

[BON-7848] 8.0.5 Breaks Z-Order Recall of Plugins

The reference number for this is BON-7848.
I'm waiting for the review to add this to the OP, in case it gets assigned to a different project or there is a linked main issue.

[EDIT: Issue number confirmed and added to the title, thread moved to Collected Issues]

Best,
by Fabio Bartolini
Wed Jan 21, 2015 8:26 am
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: 8.0.5 Breaks Z-Order Recall of Plugins on Project Load

I can confirm this on Windows 7. Looks like the instances you have opened are recalled sequentially (following the channel order) and that the Z-Order reflects this.
by Fabio Bartolini
Sun Jan 11, 2015 11:17 am
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Blank GUI Central

You are welcome. I could analyse your dumps, surely I still have some regarding that issue to check against yours.
by Fabio Bartolini
Sun Feb 08, 2015 10:11 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Blank GUI Central

Hello,

might be the issue discussed in these posts / threads:
viewtopic.php?f=185&t=32693&p=331096#p331096
viewtopic.php?f=196&t=57600#p348363

Regards,
by Fabio Bartolini
Sun Feb 08, 2015 2:01 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: EDM Producers: what is Cubase lacking most for you?

All this stuff is really useful for Indie rock drum overheads as well... 8-)

+1

Benji
by islandmusicpro
Wed Feb 11, 2015 10:44 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

EDM Producers: what is Cubase lacking most for you?

what is Cubase lacking most for you and which DAW is a positive reference about it, and why?
please be as objective has you can. I ask this because i am not sure if cubase is that much oriented for EDM and seems slow to adapt to EDM needs and so i assume EDM producers is not a big focus on Steinberg Strategy and so i don't know if i am in the right DAW.


IMO: Automation is too simplistic in cubase (specially everything that is related with the Y Axis of automation), a good reference is FL Studio which creates automation parts with it's own editor and has formula controller to relate/ modulate different knobs the way we want. I don't remember how it deals with the Y Axis because i have used it like 12 years ago, so it might not be a good reference.
by estrica2000
Wed Feb 11, 2015 6:49 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Auto LFO question

One very interesting (positive ;) ) side effect of setting up the above, is that of course this can be used to pilot Track Quick Controls via the MIDI track itself (with or without Auto LFO or any other MIDI Insert ;) ). If you set the MIDI track's input to the source that you normally use to remote control Track Quick Controls anyways, you can record your fader/knob movements, just like any other MIDI data, (and edit it ;) ), and the result will pilot the Quick Controls slots that are set to respond to the corresponding CC#s, in this instance, not using the more normal Write/Read automation ;).
by vic_france
Wed Feb 11, 2015 6:12 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Cubase Pro 8.0.10 maintenance release planned for March

Hello all,

I would like to inform you that the next Cubase 8 update (8.0.10) has been delayed it will now be released in the middle of March. This update addresses issues with the pre-count and metronome click, resolves issues using Mackie Control remotes and improves stability using third-party plug-ins. A complete list of fixes will be announced at the date of availability.

Best regards,
GN
by Guillermo
Tue Feb 17, 2015 5:09 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: does cubase 8 has sample accurate automation?

Also the term "sample accurate" is a bit of a misnomer. When folks use the term they are using it to describe the precision of the automation and not really the accuracy.

Imagine we have automation that has a data point at every sample point. Then the precision of your automation would be the same as your sample rate. Now if you playback and read that automation and each automation data point is located exactly where it was when the automation was written (i.e the automation data point occurs at exactly the same time as the sample data point that was playing at the time of writing the automation). If that occurs then your accuracy will be 100%. But lets imagine that the automation data point occurs a full second after (or before) its corresponding sample data point. In that case the accuracy sucks even though your precision is still at the sample rate.

Here's a second scenario. Your automation only has one data point for every 1,000 samples - so it a thousand times less precise. But if each automation data point occurs exactly at the same time as its corresponding sample data point, then it too has an accuracy of 100% even though the precision is different. And likewise if it is late or early by a second the accuracy is just as bad as in the first scenario.

Now in the real world you can never get 100% accurate, so the real issue is how off can you be before you can hear the difference. If the automation data point is late by 10, 20, or 30 sample data points it is still so close you can't hear the difference. But as you increase that number you eventually will be able to hear that difference. That is the number that is important - lets call it the significant delay (and it could be a positive or negative value). It describes how inaccurate it can be before it matters. I don't know what that amount is, but I'm sure it has been studied and expect Steinberg to have read the material (but who knows).

If the inaccuracy is less than this significant delay it will sound like it is 100% accurate even though it isn't. Additionally there is also the issue of drift. If this delay was consistently off by a constant amount the software could compensate for it. But if it is sometimes drifts off by 2,000 samples and other times by 10,000 that can cause a whole new layer of problems because some automation data points delay might be less than the significant delay and others greater than it. When that happens your automation will never sound consistent, it will vary on different playbacks.

Finally the reason you might not want sample precise automation data is it is going to generate a lot of unnecessary data points. Processing these in turn will consume more of your computing resources, most of it wasted. This in turn leads to lower track, plug-in counts, etc. because you run out of resources sooner. Increasing the precision beyond what is needed can actually reduce the accuracy because of processing delays that occur because of the excess computing load.
by raino
Thu Feb 19, 2015 10:15 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Blank GUI Central

Hi,

indeed - doesn't look like the issue I pointed to. Never seen that with Waves (I use the SSL Bundle plus some single plugs pretty often). I'm pretty surprised by your report about Spectral, silhouette, don't have problems with any Linplug software, except a crash in Pro 8 with Albino 3 that went away with their latest build.

Jalcide, I will keep an eye out for your report from the US guys. Looks more and more like a leak.
Feel free to PM me as well.
by Fabio Bartolini
Fri Feb 20, 2015 1:42 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Blank GUI Central

Jalcide I can appreciate your issues and frustration having spent nearly two weeks fettling a new computer.

I do have a few questions?
Are you using VST3 plugins?
Are you using 32 bit plugins?
Are you maxing (or close to) your memory?

I know that u-he has recommended for the time being that only the VST2 plugins be used. There was a long post on KVR about the difficulty they had writing the code for VST3. I have heard talk that some developers have not written the graphics coding as well as they could.

I am having an issue with Positive Grid's Bias. All I get is the image of the plugin with the rotating wheel of death - no crash but the plugin works, but I cannot edit. I get a half blank screen with Linplug's Spectral - although if I toggle the GUI on and off it sometimes comes back.

The memory issue was one that affected me and the reason for upgrading my computer. I was getting a lot of blank GUI's on some of my larger projects. Just a thought.Bear in mind that a 12 gig project also has to deal with system memory etc.

I don't run any 32 bit plugins now as they only work with JBridge - and I can't be bothered.

With regard to moving to a new DAW I guess it is a case of out of the frying pan and into the fire. My feeling is that you will only exchange one set of issues for another. Steinberg will get this right eventually and Cubase will be all the better for it. I have tried a number of other DAWS and not been that impressed to be honest. Funnily the one I hated most was Logic when helping a friend with an project followed closely by Pro Tools which has probably the most uninspiring GUI I have ever seen.
by silhouette
Fri Feb 20, 2015 1:25 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Workarounds for Lack of Proper Automation in Cubase 8

Wouldn't insering and sidechaining cb8's own envelope shaper to a suitable beat do the same trick? You can shape the attack and delay as the gate is opened and closed.
by PeppaPig
Mon Mar 02, 2015 1:04 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Workarounds for Lack of Proper Automation in Cubase 8

I presume Render In Place would achieve that too.
by PeppaPig
Mon Mar 02, 2015 8:45 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Workarounds for Lack of Proper Automation in Cubase 8

Not a solution for your exact situation as such but when I have very time critical automation, I will bounce the session at a buffer setting of 32, even if the project will not actually play live at anything close to that setting. Sure, you might not be able to audition live at this setting, and the bounce might take a little while but it gets the automation very close to sample accurate and I'd think in 99% of situations, the difference would be inaudible.
by J-S-Q
Mon Mar 02, 2015 6:13 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic