Search found 7 matches

Return

Re: Ruler Subdivisions

I am guessing that the original poster is referring to the Custom Ruler tracks, which indeed always display 16ths, whatever the current Quantize setting, unfortunately.
I haven't yet given up hope that we'll eventually get correct subdivisions for the Ruler tracks, just like we eventually got then for the Project window (so, just be patient, but don't try to hold your breath in the meantime ;) )
by vic_france
Wed Dec 25, 2013 11:40 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Ruler Subdivisions

Hm... It is working properly here...
Image
by SteveInChicago
Wed Dec 25, 2013 10:27 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Is i7-4770K integrated graphics enough for Cubase?

There are regular connectors on the mobo. Just like with integrated graphics.
by sonicstate
Mon Nov 24, 2014 8:37 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Is i7-4770K integrated graphics enough for Cubase?

In your hypothetical setup, it is true, you could drive 5 monitors. But I don't think i7 MB has additional onboard GPU. At least my ASUS doesn't. Those connectors on the back od i7 MBs are for CPU integrated GPU. Best check chipset details for your MB.
by sonicstate
Tue Nov 25, 2014 8:28 am
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Is i7-4770K integrated graphics enough for Cubase?

Thanks, and just so I understand- how does a CPU w/ integrated graphics relate to a MB with on board graphics?

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/answers/id-1795959/mobo-onboard-graphics-cpu-integrated.html

>> Back in the day, some motherboards would come with an integrated GPU into the south bridge chipset, usually a very basic intel or amd or nvidia one. It would allow surfing and that was it. it was mostly for people who didn't have a GPU.

Eventually they started to add GPU's right to the CPU to make whats called an APU. This allows the graphics to run better since they are right with the CPU, they can share the memory controller at the lowest level, send info back to the CPU the fastest possible way, etc. Intel has it in their latest i3/i5/i7 series of chips, usually being the 2000/3000/4000 series with respect to better chips have a better GPU. The intel ones allow for HD video, HD youtube, etc and that's about it. They are still no good for gaming.

AMD has their APU series, the A4, A6, A8, A10 series. Their built on GPU is far better than intels. AMD is a graphics card company and has the experience to add it to the CPU and you can actually do some basic gaming on them as well as full HD video, etc. For a basic PC that is going to be surfing, online video, watching , etc, I like the AMD A-series chips. I've built about a dozen of them for older people, basic surfing users, etc and none of them have had any problems with the use they use it for. A few were even surpirsed when their kids or grandkids wanted to use the PC and play a game or two and it played and they only bought a basic system.
by sonicstate
Mon Nov 24, 2014 12:07 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Is i7-4770K integrated graphics enough for Cubase?

CPU's integrated graphics will give you up to 3 displays. It is not on expense of latency. It is as if you had dedicated graphic card, only this time it is already built in the CPU.
In your case, with 4 screens, you could run 2 screens from internal HD 4600, and two from your single 8600GT.
by sonicstate
Sun Nov 23, 2014 8:05 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic

Re: Is i7-4770K integrated graphics enough for Cubase?

if you don't work with video then your integrated graphics will be good enough

if you work for film and television get a decent card
by mbr
Sun Nov 23, 2014 9:43 pm
 
Jump to forum
Jump to topic