APPEAL: C7.X Pro Composers: Voice Your Opinion here![POLL]

General discussions on songwriting, mixing, music business and other music related topics.

Why doesn't SB implement features with the highest user-demand and/or address top requested fixes?

TECHNICAL REASONS: They're trying but don't have the capability to execute the features and/or the application limits this.
6
21%
MARKETING REASONS: e.g. They wish to delay the features as much as they can so that the future versions have more selling points.
16
55%
FINANCIAL REASONS: They don't have enough money to pay people to add the features.
1
3%
PLAIN NEGLIGENCE: They don't care enough to truly hear the users out.
6
21%
 
Total votes : 29

APPEAL: C7.X Pro Composers: Voice Your Opinion here![POLL]

Postby MrSmith » Tue Dec 10, 2013 3:14 am

Edit 12/17: This thread has one of the highest amounts of views (relative to it's age) in this board this week (I sincerely hope it's the developers ;) ). Yet only ~40 people voiced their opinions on our last poll.

Please take a moment to vote let us know how you feel on the latest one!

Here's the result of our first poll ~40 pro users:
Image
60% felt the app was acceptable or better but 40% felt it was flaky, at best.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________

The following discussion regards a topic that is relevant to Cubase 7 and it's professional users.

Cubase is an amazing DAW. Like all programs, it has a number of issues that need to be addressed. The amount/severity of issues may differ greatly on a per user-basis, based on their needs from the application:

suntower wrote:....
It -seems- like 'recording engineers' (people who work primarily with pre-recorded audio) like the direction of Cubase more than people like me who are 'composers' or 'orchestrators' (people who create structures from the ground up -inside- Cubase.) The vast majority of improvements seem to be for people who are taking a 'song' or big sections of content and then massaging it into shape. More of a traditional engineer or producer.

But for -me- who -composes- in Cubase and want to very quickly try ideas, jettison them; edit the -structure- itself, the more features Cubase adds, the -slower- the workflow the basic operations of 'ranges' and 'windows' and 'key commands' have not really been improved in a decade. A decade.
...

ufoqbase wrote:people not affected are probably not a complete Cubase users [sic], I may think most of Cubase users could be happy with Cubase Artist or Cubase Elements especially under Windows. Because massive use of plugs and tracks creates a lot of crash reports and performance issues... Im force [sic] to remain on Cubase 6.5 under osx.


____________________________________________________________________________________________________

This thread is written as a query to the professional film/TV composers who use this app as their main DAW: that means, if you're reading this, you're a user of Cubase that demands top performance from your DAW.

Your avg. session stats reflect the baseline for modern film/TV composing: hundreds of MIDI tracks, a couple dozen inst. tracks, complex routings, etc.


As a pro-user, you require a robust app for your everyday work. The questions are:


    1. Which factor best accounts for the lack of highly-user req. FR (feature request) ports and bug fixes in Cubase 7.X? (Please place your answer in the above poll)
    2. What 3 issues stop Cubase 7 from being a near-perfect solution for you, a modern film/TV composer?


Let's have it out in the open: nothing more/less than an honest assessment of peoples feelings about this app and those responsible for it's development. If that's not relevant to Cubase 7, I don't know what is. (The last rating thread was moved to the lounge: viewtopic.php?f=198&t=51788)
Compyfox wrote:...
Less marketing talk, more bugfixing. Less money rasing, more FR porting!
...

______________________

The following are a collection of posts and threads that address some of the most-wanted/ignored features. Feel free to add to this.

cubic13 wrote:...
But since 7.5 release, I have seen here :
- Again, a drastic increase of project loading times (and I thought that it couldn't get worse...),
- Projects .cpr file size of some users here growing from 600 kb (with 7.0.6) to... 4.5 Mb ! :shock: ,
- Content download and installation issues,
- Anormal spikes here and there with still as much resources used as before if not worse for some,
- And another feature removal without warning : no more grid when using freewarp.

And beside this (among several others...) :

- Still the dreaded and unavoidable white masked timeline cursor which, as I'm more than 50 years old, appears as two vertical lines without glasses, no matter the width set for it. A workflow killer by itself...

- No UI regressions fixes : still no replacements for the preferences settings that were in both 'Appearance/General' and 'Appearance/Work area' pages (the latter has just disappeared from 6.5 to 7), especially the ones involving the grid, the buttons and work area brightness. This with others UI quirks such as the behavior of the R/W buttons of the FX/Group tracks when narrowing them.
And, last but not least, the brand new preferences color scheme, which is anything but practical : you can't even copy a color from an item to another and there is not even a way (AFAIK) to do a savable basic palette of colors in it, this to avoid the more or less erratical clicking, trying to pick up the right color tone needed. But there's so much to say about all the UI regressions...

- No fixes for Generic Remote definitions in order to clearly support both :
+ soft takeover. It works, but only if you accept to edit manually the generic remote definition xml file. In other words, this feature is unavailable, using the UI of the 'Device setup' window and not documented...
+ NRPN support : this one is completely broken and I had to find a clumsy workaround using different MIDI channel number for each control to be able to use my MPD32 endless knobs. I sent a support ticket to Steiny about this more than one month ago, and still waiting for any feedback...
This without talking about the still channel dependent layout, which means that you better think of it twice, before trying to add or remove a channel/track if plug-ins are involved in the currently active GR definition...

- No fixes concerning the key commands behavior issues with the MixConsole focus,

- No improvement of the RCE (absolutely useless with generic remote handling ; this thingy was naively one of the main reasons to purchase C7, one year back...),

- No improvement of the ASIO guard,

- Still the same click fest in the MixConsole,

- Trackpresets are still unusable with multiouts VSTis.

So, basically, more or less useful features added again, leaving more and more things half-baked, this with unwanted regressions and changes. Seems like Steiny is engaged in a headlong rush and I'm increasingly fearing what the future will bring.
...
Last edited by MrSmith on Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:57 pm, edited 39 times in total.
MrSmith
Junior Member
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 8:57 am
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Cubase 7 Pro Film/TV Composers: Voice Your Opinion/Rate

Postby papi61 » Tue Dec 10, 2013 5:13 am

Maybe you should offer an option between good and bad? It's not good and it's not bad either.

"What 3 issues stop Cubase 7 from being a near-perfect solution for you, a modern film/TV composer?"

1. Terrible frozen-track management. A frozen track is basically dead in Cubase, unless you export it and re-import it. If you freeze a track and then warp the other tracks, the frozen track will be out of sync. That's unacceptable.
In other DAW's, frozen tracks are treated as audio and they are totally editable. Oh, and you can freeze multiple tracks with a single command.

2. Obsolete windowing system. It's kinda hard to believe that in 2013 you STILL can't take the piano roll and scoring views out of track view and into another monitor. Other DAW's are completely modular and you can detach and move around your screens virtually anything.

3. Video is still cumbersome to handle in Cubase. It's assumed that the music should always be modified to fit the video and not vice-versa. Sometimes the latter is the optimal solution, and if I want to suggest something like that to a director/producer, I'd have to export everything and use another application, like Vegas. To be fair, this is an issue that affects virtually all pro-level DAW's. But you asked what would make Cubase "perfect"...
Desktop: i7 3770k, 32 GB RAM, nVidia GTX770 + GT640-DCSL fanless, 3 monitors (30" 2560x1600 + 2x 27" 1920x1080), 256 GB SSD (OS), 2 TB SATA III (audio), 3 TB SATA III (sample libraries), 3x 3 TB USB 3.0 (backup/archives), RME UFX, Win 8.1 Pro x64, Cubase 7.5, Sonar X3, Vienna Ensemble Pro 5.

Slaves: 2x i7 2700k, 16 GB RAM, 256 GB SSD, 3 TB SATA III, Win 8.1 Pro x64, Vienna Ensemble Pro 5.

Laptop: 17" HP EliteBook 8770w (i7 3820QM 2.7 Ghz/3.7 Ghz max OC, 16 GB RAM, 256 GB SSD, 1 TB SATA III), RME Babyface, Win 7 Pro x64, Vienna Ensemble Pro 5, Cubase 7.5, Sonar X3.
User avatar
papi61
Member
 
Posts: 570
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 9:56 pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 47 times

Re: Cubase 7 Pro Film/TV Composers: Voice Your Opinion/Rate

Postby MrSmith » Tue Dec 10, 2013 6:03 am

papi61 wrote:Maybe you should offer an option between good and bad? It's not good and it's not bad either.


Good idea. I revised the titles of each option, to make it more clear.

papi61 wrote:"What 3 issues stop Cubase 7 from being a near-perfect solution for you, a modern film/TV composer?"

1. Terrible frozen-track management. A frozen track is basically dead in Cubase, unless you export it and re-import it. If you freeze a track and then warp the other tracks, the frozen track will be out of sync. That's unacceptable.
In other DAW's, frozen tracks are treated as audio and they are totally editable. Oh, and you can freeze multiple tracks with a single command.

2. Obsolete windowing system. It's kinda hard to believe that in 2013 you STILL can't take the piano roll and scoring views out of track view and into another monitor. Other DAW's are completely modular and you can detach and move around your screens virtually anything.

3. Video is still cumbersome to handle in Cubase. It's assumed that the music should always be modified to fit the video and not vice-versa. Sometimes the latter is the optimal solution, and if I want to suggest something like that to a director/producer, I'd have to export everything and use another application, like Vegas. To be fair, this is an issue that affects virtually all pro-level DAW's. But you asked what would make Cubase "perfect"...


Agreed!
MrSmith
Junior Member
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 8:57 am
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Cubase 7 Pro Film/TV Composers: Voice Your Opinion/Rate

Postby Buzthafuzz » Tue Dec 10, 2013 9:31 am

papi61 wrote:Maybe you should offer an option between good and bad? It's not good and it's not bad either.

"What 3 issues stop Cubase 7 from being a near-perfect solution for you, a modern film/TV composer?"

1. Terrible frozen-track management. A frozen track is basically dead in Cubase, unless you export it and re-import it. If you freeze a track and then warp the other tracks, the frozen track will be out of sync. That's unacceptable.
In other DAW's, frozen tracks are treated as audio and they are totally editable. Oh, and you can freeze multiple tracks with a single command.

2. Obsolete windowing system. It's kinda hard to believe that in 2013 you STILL can't take the piano roll and scoring views out of track view and into another monitor. Other DAW's are completely modular and you can detach and move around your screens virtually anything.

3. Video is still cumbersome to handle in Cubase. It's assumed that the music should always be modified to fit the video and not vice-versa. Sometimes the latter is the optimal solution, and if I want to suggest something like that to a director/producer, I'd have to export everything and use another application, like Vegas. To be fair, this is an issue that affects virtually all pro-level DAW's. But you asked what would make Cubase "perfect"...


Yes! Agreed too!!
Buzthafuzz
New Member
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:26 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Cubase 7 Pro Film/TV Composers: Voice Your Opinion/Rate

Postby paaltio » Tue Dec 10, 2013 10:48 am

MrSmith wrote:2. What 3 issues stop Cubase 7 from being a near-perfect solution for you, a modern film/TV composer?


#1: I would group together all the little workflow issues I have. I'd need a "glue selected notes shortcut". Also a "glue only adjacent notes" shortcut, supported as an option when gluing regions in the arrange, so basically allow global edits for material not right on the grid without requiring a whole bunch of manual fixing. Change attributes for all selected notes in all active parts. Optionally completely sticky attributes for MIDI input, so repeated starts don't always require pressing the attribute keyswitch again. Multitrack CC inserting from the arrange. Keyboard shortcuts for variations of "insert CC ramp at cycle". Split directions with the scissors as well as the range edit tool. Single keyboard shortcut for playing the session at 50-75% tempo for recording harder to play figures. Convert ramp tempos to a number of jumps within the session that ensure the exported tempo map works 1:1 in Pro Tools. Allow MIDI and audio on the same track for multitimbral instrument outputs. Select top notes (can kludge it with a macro with C7 logical editors improvements though). Automation groups. Chord track with more intelligent support for chord and non-chord scale material in the same region, with proper voice leading. Process Tempos with support for multiple jumps, so you can lock start and end timecodes and then only the curve changes. Export to video file by compressing a small H.264 at the same time. Stuff I do in AutoHotkey right now: Marker batch export (I know, it's Nuendo-only), MIDI-track based batch export i.e. export with each one track or group of tracks soloed. I'm probably still forgetting a lot, because I've kind of just given up on collecting these. The amount of time spent writing feature requests for niche stuff like this that will likely never get done is not worth it unfortunately.

#2: DP-style chunks would help so much with managing multiple cues. Although the only positive thing about doing everything in a single session, like I do now, is that with a single tempo map, we also have a single grid-correct session for Pro Tools for the mixing engineer. So I'll add that chunks with a "consolidate to single session" feature where it adds the needed tempo changes between cues to do automatically what I do manually would be the ideal solution. And a DP-style V-rack for this, albeit with automation supported.

#3: REAPER-style scripting. Again I don't really expect this to happen anytime soon, since it's not exactly a surface feature you just throw in. But I feel this is the future of the industry for artists of all kinds, because the use cases are just way too varied for software companies to be able to fill all the workflow styles. I could do most of the stuff in #1 myself if Cubase had this. It's incredibly frustrating to be missing out on simple features that would take no more than an hour to implement (based on how long it took in ReaScript), yet contribute to the workflow immensely.
paaltio
Junior Member
 
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Cubase 7 Pro Film/TV Composers: Voice Your Opinion/Rate

Postby MrSmith » Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:59 pm

(Off-topic posts were removed)
MrSmith
Junior Member
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 8:57 am
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Cubase 7 Pro Film/TV Composers: Voice Your Opinion/Rate

Postby cubic13 » Sun Dec 15, 2013 10:32 pm

Even if I'm not a pro film/TV composer, I voted FLAKY. The quote of the previous post explains extensively why, I guess...
DAW : i7-870 (HT enabled) - Asus P7-P55D-E - 16 Gb DDR3-1600 - 2 x WD Black Caviar 1 Tb - Radeon 6450 GPU (512 Mb) - Windows 7 Pro SP1 (64) / E-Mu 1616m PCIe + Behringer ADA8000
Soft & plug-ins : Cubase 5.1.1 (64) & 6.5.5 (64) + HSO / Emulator X3 / TruePianos / Ivory II / GSi Mr Ray73 MkII & VB3 / Sylenth1 / Alchemy / Loomer String / Arturia MMV / BFD2 / Ariesverb
Gear : Studiologic VMK-188+ / Akai MPD32 controller / Akai ME30P MIDI Patchbay / Korg 05RW / Roland D110 / Yamaha TX802 / Zoom G9.2tt / My really old ones (pre-MIDI era) : ARP Odyssey + Korg MS20
User avatar
cubic13
Member
 
Posts: 587
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 8:46 pm
Location: near the Serre-Ponçon lake, french Alps
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: Cubase 7 Pro Film/TV Composers: Voice Your Opinion/Rate

Postby dr4kan » Sun Dec 15, 2013 11:03 pm

papi61 wrote:Maybe you should offer an option between good and bad? It's not good and it's not bad either.

"What 3 issues stop Cubase 7 from being a near-perfect solution for you, a modern film/TV composer?"

1. Terrible frozen-track management. A frozen track is basically dead in Cubase, unless you export it and re-import it. If you freeze a track and then warp the other tracks, the frozen track will be out of sync. That's unacceptable.
In other DAW's, frozen tracks are treated as audio and they are totally editable. Oh, and you can freeze multiple tracks with a single command.

2. Obsolete windowing system. It's kinda hard to believe that in 2013 you STILL can't take the piano roll and scoring views out of track view and into another monitor. Other DAW's are completely modular and you can detach and move around your screens virtually anything.

3. Video is still cumbersome to handle in Cubase. It's assumed that the music should always be modified to fit the video and not vice-versa. Sometimes the latter is the optimal solution, and if I want to suggest something like that to a director/producer, I'd have to export everything and use another application, like Vegas. To be fair, this is an issue that affects virtually all pro-level DAW's. But you asked what would make Cubase "perfect"...


I quote every single word. The frozen-track management, in particular, is incredibly poor in Cubase even though it's a very important thing in many professional environments, where the track count is very high. In addition to the previous list, I would also add that the media import/export is also quite obsolete: to export mono tracks in batch requires a PhD, to export many midi parts to different files is virtually impossible, etc...
Cubase 7.5, Mac i7 16 GB ram (512 + 512 Samsung 840 pro), OSX 10.9.0
MR816X, Motu Ultralite, UAD 2, MCU Pro, CC121, Adam A7x, Axiom 49...
dr4kan
Member
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:30 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: Cubase 7 Pro Film/TV Composers: Voice Your Opinion/Rate

Postby MrSmith » Sun Dec 15, 2013 11:21 pm

cubic13 contributed a good post (viewtopic.php?p=318744#p318744) that outlines some the issues present in Cubase 7.5:

(Moved it to the OP)
Last edited by MrSmith on Tue Dec 17, 2013 3:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
MrSmith
Junior Member
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 8:57 am
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Cubase 7 Pro Film/TV Composers: Voice Your Opinion/Rate

Postby ufoqbase » Mon Dec 16, 2013 5:39 pm

I'm a film and tv composer, unfortunately i've lost 2 works working under cubase 7.0.6 with crash and impossible to reopen the song project. I usually work with almost 100 MIDI tracks connected with Kontakt and other vsti instruments, then 60-70 audio tracks with samples and voice, interments etc recorded with their own sub mix and relative bus mixing and ffx. Somethimes routed with external FFX like compressors, Elysia and Maselec real not plugs. At end of story i've back to 6.5.5 because it's stable and guarantee the ending of my projects, the tons of C7 issue is annoying and distractive for that kind of job. Im so sorry to say that but i've trash my money with C7. :?
Macbook pro 3.3ghz, 16Gb ram, Native Instruments Komplete Ultimate, Addictive Drums, IK Sampletank, Amplitube.
ufoqbase
Junior Member
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:55 am
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: Cubase 7 Pro Film/TV Composers: Voice Your Opinion/Rate

Postby wcb123 » Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:29 pm

Booked
Windows x64 Pro
Award Modular BIOS v6.00PG
Intel i7 980 @3.33GHz (12 CPUs), ~3.4GHz
Memory - 48Gb
______________

Cubase 7
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
Focusrite Saffire Pro24
Casio Privia 330
Quested s8r
wcb123
Junior Member
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Cubase 7 Pro Film/TV Composers: Voice Your Opinion/Rate

Postby Jeff Hayat » Mon Dec 16, 2013 11:10 pm

Rocked
Jeff Hayat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:46 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 25 times

Re: Cubase 7 Pro Film/TV Composers: Voice Your Opinion/Rate

Postby Wolfie2112 » Tue Dec 17, 2013 12:27 am

Film/TV composer here. Honestly, I have been loving C7 since jumping over six months ago from 20+ years on Cakewalk (most recently, X2). No complaints. If I had one suggestion, it would be for the ability to export a Quicktime file, complete with sound cues, that I could send to a director for reference.
Wolfie2112
Junior Member
 
Posts: 104
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 4:43 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Cubase 7 Pro Film/TV Composers: Voice Your Opinion/Rate

Postby papi61 » Tue Dec 17, 2013 1:34 am

Wolfie2112 wrote:If I had one suggestion, it would be for the ability to export a Quicktime file, complete with sound cues, that I could send to a director for reference.


Agreed, and that was implicitly included in my #3 point. Also I would like to have basic video editing functions, including time compression/expansion. There are $30 shareware products that include such features, it shouldn't be too complicated for Steinberg to add those (or maybe just buy out one of those products? Hint hint...) Sometimes the best solution is not to adjust the music but to adjust the images. And trust me, as much as it may pain a director/producer to be told that and admit you're right, they're usually receptive to good ideas...
Desktop: i7 3770k, 32 GB RAM, nVidia GTX770 + GT640-DCSL fanless, 3 monitors (30" 2560x1600 + 2x 27" 1920x1080), 256 GB SSD (OS), 2 TB SATA III (audio), 3 TB SATA III (sample libraries), 3x 3 TB USB 3.0 (backup/archives), RME UFX, Win 8.1 Pro x64, Cubase 7.5, Sonar X3, Vienna Ensemble Pro 5.

Slaves: 2x i7 2700k, 16 GB RAM, 256 GB SSD, 3 TB SATA III, Win 8.1 Pro x64, Vienna Ensemble Pro 5.

Laptop: 17" HP EliteBook 8770w (i7 3820QM 2.7 Ghz/3.7 Ghz max OC, 16 GB RAM, 256 GB SSD, 1 TB SATA III), RME Babyface, Win 7 Pro x64, Vienna Ensemble Pro 5, Cubase 7.5, Sonar X3.
User avatar
papi61
Member
 
Posts: 570
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 9:56 pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 47 times

Re: Cubase 7 Pro Film/TV Composers: Voice Your Opinion/Rate

Postby lukasbrooklyn » Tue Dec 17, 2013 1:50 am

the time spent shuffling video formats around to find one cubase accepts (dare i say 'likes') is time not well spent, so i'd say the video handling issues first and foremost. plus all the usual workflow issues, bugs, the mixconsole, ...
c6, c7.5.2, w7, i7 4930k 6core, klein&hummel o300, adam s2x, lavry DA, SSL duende, RME HDSP, audeze lcd-2, avantone mixcubes, slate digital, ...
lukasbrooklyn
Member
 
Posts: 607
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 8:51 pm
Has thanked: 33 times
Been thanked: 49 times

Re: Cubase 7 Pro Film/TV Composers: Voice Your Opinion/Rate

Postby J-S-Q » Tue Dec 17, 2013 2:46 am

lukasbrooklyn wrote:the time spent shuffling video formats around to find one cubase accepts (dare i say 'likes') is time not well spent, so i'd say the video handling issues first and foremost. plus all the usual workflow issues, bugs, the mixconsole, ...


Could be my imagination but it feels like C7 is better in this regard. I used to have to convert video formats quite often with C5 to make it work but haven't had to do this as much (possibly not at all) with C7. Maybe I've just been lucky.
Cubase 7.5 64 Bit, Win8.1 64Bit
CPU: Intel 4930k. MOTHERBOARD: Gigabyte GA-EX79-UP4. RAM: 16GB Corsair Vengeance Jet Black. GRAPHICS CARD: Gigabyte GV-N96TSL GeForce 9600GT. SYSTEM DRIVE: Corsair M4 SSD 128GB. AUDIO INTERFACE: Steinberg MR816-CSX
J-S-Q
Junior Member
 
Posts: 149
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 1:45 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Cubase 7 Pro Film/TV Composers: Voice Your Opinion/Rate

Postby orchetect » Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:41 am

1) Audio engine, audio engine, audio engine. (On Mac especially).
  • I have spent hundreds of hours benchmarking the top DAWs over the years for plug-in load and Logic X now wins by a landslide. I can load 200+ Kontakt plug-ins into Logic X all playing simultaneously and they don't break, crackle or pop even once. On a suped-up 12-core Mac Pro I can barely load 40-50 before Cubase goes thermonuclear. This is unacceptable. If this is supposed to be a professional DAW, it needs to meet or exceed the competition - not pitifully get trounced by it. I have seriously contemplated jumping ship to Logic X for this reason alone.
  • If a session gets unstable because of this, MTC sync output is affected and jitters like mad. Also, retrospective record for MIDI data works maybe 1 in 10 times. Most of the time it's a jumbled mess of MIDI data. I am almost certain this is due to the instability of the MIDI buffer.
  • ASIO Guard is a total non-starter. It doesn't reduce the ASIO meter, doesn't improve performance, and in fact introduces more problems - not the least of which is unreliable initial playback.
  • Sessions take forever to load and I can clearly see as each instrument is loaded one at a time, Cubase is maxing out one CPU core at a time even though I have 12 at its disposal. Implementing a multi-core loading scheme that loads multiple instruments/plug-ins simultaneously could speed up session load times dramatically. When opening dozens of sessions a day, this adds up fast. In film/TV, time is money.
2) Random crashes. Long-standing issue for years.
  • Guaranteed, several times a day Cubase will just seize up and have to be force-quit. Not traceable to any plug-in or reproducible process.
  • Enabling EuCon remote devices causes Cubase to crash constantly, most notably when deleting instrument tracks. This has been an issue from 7.0 thru 7.5 and possibly back to 6.x if my memory serves.
  • At least once a day the Video Service will stop functioning for no reason, and Cubase (and my active session) has to be restarted/reloaded.
  • Inconsistent preference commitment to disk: Some preferences get saved only at the time Cubase is gracefully quit. With the number of times that Cubase crashes, I often find tweaks and preferences/settings are not remembered on next launch because there was no chance for them to be saved. Please, make all prefs save to disk immediately when changed.

3) MixConsole shortcomings. I love the new mixer, but it's killing me...
  • On a large resolution screen like 27" Thunderbolt Display, zooming or scrolling is so slow it's turned me off of using MixConsole for all but the most critical functions.
  • In 7.5, still no import/export global layout presets for import into other projects.
Steffan Andrews | Composer for Film, TV & Games | www.orchetect.com | imdb
DAW #1: Mac Pro 5,1 2.4GHz 12-core 64GB RAM | DAW #2: iMac 14,2 3.5GHz 4-core 32GB RAM | OS X 10.9.3 | Cubase 7.5.20 64bit | UA Apollo
User avatar
orchetect
Member
 
Posts: 374
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 1:28 am
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: Cubase 7 Pro Film/TV Composers: Voice Your Opinion/Rate

Postby Wolfie2112 » Tue Dec 17, 2013 4:35 pm

Orchetect, have you considered VEPro? It would substantially speed up your load times, and handle all of your VI's....and even better if you host them on a slave. For example, it keeps huge templates loaded in the backgorund, so everything is already loaded for multple projects.
Wolfie2112
Junior Member
 
Posts: 104
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 4:43 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Cubase 7 Pro Film/TV Composers: Voice Your Opinion/Rate

Postby orchetect » Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:08 pm

Wolfie2112 wrote:Orchetect, have you considered VEPro? It would substantially speed up your load times, and handle all of your VI's....and even better if you host them on a slave. For example, it keeps huge templates loaded in the backgorund, so everything is already loaded for multple projects.


I have 6 licenses and have used it since it was first released. I retired it a year ago when I dissolved my 6 rack PCs and I'm just working in-the-box on a single Mac Pro now. I prefer to work entirely with instrument tracks (one Kontakt per track) so the VEPro route no longer works for me.
Steffan Andrews | Composer for Film, TV & Games | www.orchetect.com | imdb
DAW #1: Mac Pro 5,1 2.4GHz 12-core 64GB RAM | DAW #2: iMac 14,2 3.5GHz 4-core 32GB RAM | OS X 10.9.3 | Cubase 7.5.20 64bit | UA Apollo
User avatar
orchetect
Member
 
Posts: 374
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 1:28 am
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: Cubase 7 Pro Film/TV Composers: Voice Your Opinion/Rate

Postby paaltio » Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:55 pm

orchetect wrote:[*]ASIO Guard is a total non-starter. It doesn't reduce the ASIO meter, doesn't improve performance, and in fact introduces more problems - not the least of which is unreliable initial playback.


ASIO Guard is a baffling thing. There was clearly an opportunity to do something like Logic's hybrid buffering that works incredibly well, but Cubase's version doesn't even support multitimbral instruments, and regardless it seems to cause performance issues with supported plugins. Goes in the same "so close, yet so far" category with the new instrument track. Steinberg has an opportunity here with both features to do a truly cool thing, but unfortunately it's going to take some more time to truly get there.
paaltio
Junior Member
 
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Cubase 7 Pro Film/TV Composers: Voice Your Opinion/Rate

Postby MrSmith » Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:05 pm

paaltio wrote:
orchetect wrote:[*]ASIO Guard is a total non-starter. It doesn't reduce the ASIO meter, doesn't improve performance, and in fact introduces more problems - not the least of which is unreliable initial playback.


ASIO Guard is a baffling thing. There was clearly an opportunity to do something like Logic's hybrid buffering that works incredibly well, but Cubase's version doesn't even support multitimbral instruments, and regardless it seems to cause performance issues with supported plugins. Goes in the same "so close, yet so far" category with the new instrument track. Steinberg has an opportunity here with both features to do a truly cool thing, but unfortunately it's going to take some more time to truly get there.


Indeed. Their execution doesn't seem to be there. How would this sound for a 7.5 update?

WHAT 7.5 SHOULD HAVE BEEN:
    - ASIO Guard now effects multi-timbral instruments
    - Updated Expression Map GUI
    - Reduced track loading & saving times via multi-threading
    - Track presets maintain their routing
    - Folder tracks can now be exported as track archives

I'd hand over $100 w/o skipping a beat to Steinberg if the above were the case. That's what I don't understand: Why do they keep adding half-baked features and then take their time fixing them? Why don't they implemet these features with the highest user-demand?

I created a poll to get a feeling of the user-base on this topic. Really though, ask yourself this: when's the last time we got an update that had even THREE high-priority features mentioned in it? No, that doesn't include chord tracks :lol:
Last edited by MrSmith on Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:00 pm, edited 7 times in total.
MrSmith
Junior Member
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 8:57 am
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Cubase 7 Pro Film/TV Composers: Voice Your Opinion/Rate

Postby Wolfie2112 » Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:07 pm

orchetect wrote:
Wolfie2112 wrote:Orchetect, have you considered VEPro? It would substantially speed up your load times, and handle all of your VI's....and even better if you host them on a slave. For example, it keeps huge templates loaded in the backgorund, so everything is already loaded for multple projects.


I have 6 licenses and have used it since it was first released. I retired it a year ago when I dissolved my 6 rack PCs and I'm just working in-the-box on a single Mac Pro now. I prefer to work entirely with instrument tracks (one Kontakt per track) so the VEPro route no longer works for me.


But if your sessions are taking forever to load, why not have zero downtime in that regard? You could load hundreds of instruments into a template(s) and compose a ton of individual cues (as new projects) without ever having to load anything.

But you bring up a god point about instrument tracks...I prefer that as opposed to MIDI tracks for some reason.
Wolfie2112
Junior Member
 
Posts: 104
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 4:43 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Cubase 7 Pro Film/TV Composers: Voice Your Opinion/Rate

Postby orchetect » Wed Dec 18, 2013 1:22 am

Wolfie2112 wrote:But if your sessions are taking forever to load, why not have zero downtime in that regard? You could load hundreds of instruments into a template(s) and compose a ton of individual cues (as new projects) without ever having to load anything.


I already said I did the static template thing with my 6 external PCs and I no longer want to work that way (externally or not). Part of the issue was that changes to the instruments weren't saved with the project because the static template was so large it ran in uncoupled mode. I work modularly now where each instrument is its own instrument track so any changes to them save with the project, and I can library them in the MediaBay as track presets to be recalled quickly at a later time. Trust me, there are no suggestions that I have not traversed a hundred different angles by now, but thanks any way. This is the workflow that is most efficient for me.
Steffan Andrews | Composer for Film, TV & Games | www.orchetect.com | imdb
DAW #1: Mac Pro 5,1 2.4GHz 12-core 64GB RAM | DAW #2: iMac 14,2 3.5GHz 4-core 32GB RAM | OS X 10.9.3 | Cubase 7.5.20 64bit | UA Apollo
User avatar
orchetect
Member
 
Posts: 374
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 1:28 am
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: Cubase 7 Pro Film/TV Composers: Voice Your Opinion/Rate

Postby Wolfie2112 » Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:54 am

Cool. Always interesting to hear other's work flows.
Wolfie2112
Junior Member
 
Posts: 104
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 4:43 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Cubase 7 Pro Film/TV Composers: Voice Your Opinion/Rate

Postby suntower » Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:56 am

I've been thinking about this a LOT recently. It's been pointed out to me that I rant a lot and I've been trying to figure out what my problem is. Truthfully, there are no dealbreakers in Cubase. It does basically everything I need very competently. And they keep adding neat-o features which make it more and more flexible, which is great. It's also 'fast' in terms of actual execution: loading, rendering, etc. are all satisfactory.

But here's the thing... Cubase keeps getting SLOWER to work with. Not -faster-. What inflames my sphincter with each passing year is that Cubase is like this: I go to a restaurant and I ask for a diet plate. And the waiter brings me the all you can eat buffet. And I say, 'No... I want the diet plate.' But the guy keeps bringing more of the all you can eat deal. And I feel bad for complaining, because... the guy keeps bringing me more food. I feel ungrateful---but it's not what I know is good for me. And I feel like a 'whiner'. But what they keep giving me is not what I need. It's great, but it's not what I -really- need.

1. Window management is rough.

2. Preset Management/File Management really stinks.

3. Key commands and icons and window layouts are getting less and less efficient.

...And all that stuff seems so 'small' but the truth? I work SLOWER now than I did in 2007. And I'm not getting any younger so it's getting increasingly annoying.

The projects I work on now are MUCH larger than they used to be. People expect MORE stuff; not 16 tracks... 160 tracks. And the workflow hasn't kept up. In fact, it's heading in the wrong direction.

And THAT is what drives me nuts. Many of the changes SB keeps making are not what I need. They're doing cool stuff, but it's clear they aren't listening to the stuff -I- care most about and that's frustrating. So I feel trapped. I have too many years in to change. Which is not a great feeling sometimes.

---JC
Primary: i7960 16gb RAM, SSD, 3 1TB HD, Win7/64 Ult
Second: Q8400 16gb RAM 3 1TB HD, Win7/64
Laptop: HP Pavilion i5, 8GB RAM 7200RPM, Cubase 7.5, iCPro, WL7,
Vienna Ensemble5, VSL, NI Komplete, EWQLSO, etc. CME UF8, Roland TD-12 VDrums
User avatar
suntower
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1198
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 7:53 am
Location: Seattle/Dublin
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Next

Return to Steinberg Lounge

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Vlxx and 1 guest