Andresgp wrote:Thanks for all the comments and feedback guys, it's all really welcomed on this end.
Very interesting to see the general consensus around the vocal! What is it that turns you guys off this particular one? I'm genuinely curious. Is it the tone? The clarity of the words? The particular effects?
I should mention that the vocal was artificially made using a vocoder. The "raw" vocal sounded very different I must say (since we are not singers).
That also leads me to ask, do any of you have had experience with vocoders? If so, which ones do you use? Any techniques to help give the words clarity and definition? This is our first time playing around with a vocoder, and although it was a blast I can definitely see room for improvement.
Bane wrote:Time after time, I've found that working with audio recordings in a MIDI driven track is so hard, due to the fact that you are stepping out from the digital framework that's been layed down by professionals and into the home recording dimension with all of it's challenges.
kzarider wrote:My opinion is that any effect in a production should be used only on occasions to make a point or turn someones head. Sorta like a what was that moment. The lyrics are really good but if you hadn't written them down I would have never known what you were saying.
kzarider wrote:...maybe ask Daniel or BAB or other volunteers to help you with the vocal, after just listening to their stuff I'd say both have world class voices
Suprawill1 wrote:Liked it. A professional performance, good mix and an avant garde approach. I think that most of the sounds used are in "an effect" catagory so the vocoder vocals didn't bother me. Maybe because I'm more an instrumentalist which makes mine a unique opinion but if you're looking to expose this song, you heard it from the majority ... at least so far.
Andresgp wrote:Suprawill1 wrote:Liked it. A professional performance, good mix and an avant garde approach. I think that most of the sounds used are in "an effect" catagory so the vocoder vocals didn't bother me. Maybe because I'm more an instrumentalist which makes mine a unique opinion but if you're looking to expose this song, you heard it from the majority ... at least so far.
Thanks for the comments my good man. We are more instrumental oriented too. It wasn't until recently that we started adding vocals to our songs, although I still feel we treat them more like another instrument than a vocal. Glad you could listen to the song under that point of view!
The general opinion does seem to be that the vocal needs to be clearer and less effecty, not only in this forum but from a lot of other people that have had a chance to hear it. We are still fans of effect, but its been interesting seeing these contrasting opinions. Hopefully we can refine the technique for later productions where we can meet people in a happy medium. We definitely don't want something as important as the vocals to turn off people from our music.
Suprawill1 wrote:I would suggest using a more contemporary approach by employing the cher-bot technique that you can achieve by using almost any of the vocal pitch correction programs. It is widely used by R&B, techno and electric artists. It would keep your vocals clear, be more recognizable and retain the robotic effect that would keep them in the spirit of your instrumentation. LMK what you think.
tex wrote:quite liked it dude, not gonna echo above but keep doing what u doing, not many songs i listen to the lyrcs, but did on this one. it is a kool message
We have actually experimented with VariAudio and the Pitch correct plug-in that comes with Cubase in some of our earlier productions this year. Like you said, it does keep the vocals clearer and its an easier approach if you have a well recorded vocal. The problem we were running into was that our outboard gear doesn't match the sound quality of our software gear. It was specially hard to match the crisp high mids end or cutting bass you get out of the box with some of these synths. The advantage of using the vocoder was that we could use the awesome sound of the synth + essentially any input source (our voices). Likewise, we didn't have to find an actual singer to sing the part .The downside though, was the loss of intelligibility in the words.
I'm really curious about how bands like Daft Punk managed to get such a crystal clear sound out of their vocoder in their latest album. They have sure mastered this type of technique.
Suprawill1 wrote:Just another idea - maybe you can keep the vocoder part but lace it with your vari-audio version. Just enough to articulate a little more. But then again, maybe it was your intent to keep the vocals vague.
HornForHire wrote:Hi there,
I like it, and I even like the vocoder part.
It fits in nicely with the rest of the sounds.
Reminds me of the latest Daft Punk record, which isn't a bad thing.
Users browsing this forum: Woodcrest Studio and 2 guests