No I haven’t. I’m just wondering if they’re going to I guess double up on it and relabel one. This question pops up regularly ever since the free channel assignment was taken away and it seems sort of obvious to me that the thing to do is make sure all the major channel assignments are available and labeled correctly. I certainly don’t see a reason why a format such as 7.1 (Dolby) isn’t included if people are actually using it to mix films.
Occasionally, I do. Most recent project was for Beady Eye. Broadcaster required a non standard channel config so Nuendo could not be used. Pro Tools was used instead. Fredo, will Nuendo be returning to free channel assignment to allow for non standard configurations?
How are PT and Reaper handling the relation of speakers, their corresponding levels, panning between speakers, panners, and up/downmixing/converting of channels, whenever you set up some exotic surround config?
The old N1 customized speaker config worked for very exotic surround configs, but it would never have worked for setting up a standard, calibrated format.
True, but all I’m wanting to do is set a multi channel group, so that I can feed 8 stereo instruments into it and nsert one instance of SPAT. Currently it is a real pain.
I think we misunderstood each other. I thought you mean that with free routing the actual standard routings like a 5.1 cinema format wouldn’t have worked. But I see now that’s not what you were talking about.
Having said that though I think your point is a bit moot though since I’m betting many of those who would take advantage of “free routing” would be able to compensate for what you’re talking about. Obviously if some routing is custom it’s up to the creator to create the what needs to happen, or adjust to it, if you know what I mean.