To get in direct contact with Steinberg is nearly impossible.
Maybe with this post a non Beta-Tester can have a small influence on Nuendo’s feature list.
Please keep it short, it’s just a list
ps: i don’t want to go back to PT
To get in direct contact with Steinberg is nearly impossible.
Maybe with this post a non Beta-Tester can have a small influence on Nuendo’s feature list.
Please keep it short, it’s just a list
ps: i don’t want to go back to PT
Hello,
you can always contact me if desired.
Thanks,
Timo
The first 4 points are known topcis for improvements.
Thanks,
Timo
How about the offline-process window handling?
And again; why can’t you comment on the FR threads? It’s like a crap-shoot now. Feels like we’re talking to a wall.
Hey Timo,
You really go out of your way to avoid this, don’t you?
We do this all of the time with the build-in Time stretch.
Use Solo Musical @ 104,16666% or 96%.
We get a lot of work doing pulls for different companies, as they say that ours sound best.
Fredo
feels like xmas time again:
Export a file with History or in preferences select if you want to save History with project. More memory needed but for me very usefull until work ends.
Hello,
these functional changes should be feasible in an N6.x update, they don’t seem to be very complicated. However it won’t be in the initial Nuendo 6.x version, which will arrive in about 2 weeks.
Thanks,
Timo
I will have comments on the FR thread soon.
Thanks,
Timo
More Studio Sends please?
“8-Up” (or more) spectral view for tracks (view audio parts based on spectral content rather than amplitude).
Spectral Editing at track level OR spectral editor option within the sample editor window.
Spectral analysis tool-set update (spectral information is at last available in the EQ display, which is great, but a fully fledged analysis tool with a colour spectrographic display should surely be a standard feature).
Change bus architecture to allow for custom speaker configurations (for example Reaper offers 64 channels per bus).