this is what im doing mr.rooâs , you can open the c6.5 projects in c7 perfectly there are no issues on this system doing that ,c7 is a very nice looking program and its worth a look to make your own mind up about it , quite a lot of people are having graphic issues with the mixer on both platforms BUT not everyone , the controlroom if you use that has itâs own little quirks BUT not everyone is having these issues , i personally love the look of c7 and understand that the more dedicated graphic design is more CPU demanding than c6 so that does not bother me , the ASio guard ive not had to bother with as c7 does run very smooth from the project page itâs only clicking and then more clicking on the mixer that causes sluggishness and glitches BUT not everyone is having these issues .
sorry to rattle on the only way you are going to find out if c7 is for you is to try it , youâll be impressed with the upgraded GUI ⌠i say go for it as itâs not going to stop you rolling back to c6 if you donât like it , make your own mind up but for me i hope steinberg are going to keep their promise about the final update for c6 just to show they do keep their promises ( im using 6.5 until c7 is ready )
Nice debate guys, but im not asking for speculation,
Im asking for facts, LOL
We need to have a steinberg answer, dont we?
See you, and thanks for supporting my topic!!!
J
filterfreak. I loaded it and I agree with basically all your comments and concerns. Thanks for writing a response. It is interesting to use the new vs. the old. This said, I am leaning towards the old dog thing at this point. The mixer is not as controllable to me, like having 4 or 5 windows open and âah - theyâre open, how do I close them?â feeling. Oh well, it is pretty.
jss - câmon, Brother, your post isnât getting buried.
Once upon a timeâŚ
someone there?
I really cant see 6.5 being updated any further now that 7 is out of the bagâŚhas anyone down loaded the trial version of 7? Is it stand alone? It doesnt trash 6.5?
my personal opinion is stay with c6 until they sort all the issues out
steinberg promised a last up date so im sure they will keep to it
6.5 will be updated further, since Steinberg already told us (and did the same with C5). Also, the current 6.5.4 version is not officially supported. I didnât try C7 yet, but it does coexist with C6(.5) and any other Cubase version.
Yes, C6.5 and C7 are independent of each other and both work on the same computer⌠What I donât know is if the various libraries and sound banks, along with aftermarket VSTs need to be doubled up or whether you could tell C7 to share with C6.5. (I think C7 was a 5G+ download, BTW.) So I just doubled up everything if you follow. It works great, turning either version on, closing it and opening the other but I surely have about 3G of data doubled up. (Waves is not a problem as far as doubling up the data because the plugins stay in in an independent folder - but you do have to copy and paste the V9 load app into C7.)
many thanks for the info-its certainly a big file to download I shall be installing to today
A bug free Cubase 6.5.5 would be nice!
Cubase 7.x.x that runs fine on OS X 10.6.8 (Snow Leopard) would also be nice!
Greetings,
Peter
âŚcmon guys
Personally I don´t understand why Steinberg would release the new version 7, before they even finished the previous version. Especially when the latest version of Cubase 6.5 has been this âbeta pre-releaseâ for a really long time.
Maybe I´m just old school like that.
I agree!
I would like the spectral analyser in every channel and pregain, Highcut lowcut. Also chordtrack and asio guard into Cubase 6.5.5 ( I could pay desame money as C7 upgrade! Then I am satisfied. My project are seldom more than 15 tracks. I dont need super flexibel mixer. My lenovo compact dualcore 3.0 still performs really well och C6.
Steinberg never shapes a product to perfection. Look at the Steinberg history and youâll notice they had some great products with even greater potential, but they tend to move to fast for real in depth refinement or development.
Best recent example is Halion 4. Introduced with a lot of bells and whistles, and at this point the refinement and development are stalled completely, while there is so much work still to be done to make it competitive to other products, despite its great potential.
A classic Steinberg case!
Sure you do!
1-Release C6.5.5 and get some user thanks and some user grief.(âitâs still not rightâ)
2-Realse C7 and get some $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ and some user grief. (âitâs still not rightâ)
And the beat goes onâŚ
{â-â}
Customer trust and revenues on a new product would be higher if existing customers are sure the software development isnât terminated before all flaws are properly ironed out.
Indeed, the beat goes on! Question is: How many people will stay on the dance floor when the drummer messes up?
Depends if its a waltz or a fox trot lol
Itâs a slow Polka.
I guess that says it all.
I have a hate and love relationship with Cubase and Steinberg. I love the potential and features, but I never get for my money a good performance (no lag) and stable software release that I can rely on. And with every new release I´m getting more and more tired of this âmerry go roundâ.