I’m not going to get into this argument, but just running with the car analogy for a moment, if you take your car in for a service or a software update you do not expect to get it back with a series of things broken that were not part of the service or software update. Software is by it’s nature complex and requires a great deal of testing - isn’t that what a QA department is for? (I’m assuming that Steinberg has one, but the sheer number of issues introduced with N6 affecting old and new features does make me wonder). BTW, ‘QA’ stands for Quality Assurance.
We, the users, should not be the QA department although it is inevitable that some bugs will come out of the woodwork after a software release, in which case the provider (in this case Steinberg) should rapidly fix the problems before inflicting a new set of features and bugs on the people that provide their income.
I hope this is not seen as an unreasonable view.