jpgtr wrote:There's more to measuring performance than seeing how many hundred reverb plug-ins you can run at one time.
Wolfie2112 wrote:jpgtr wrote:There's more to measuring performance than seeing how many hundred reverb plug-ins you can run at one time.
Geez, I'm glad finally someone finally brought that up! Some people are so consumed with benchmarks and technical data that they forget about what the DAW is really for....creativity. Granted, you need to be sure a system can handle your needs, but you also need to be realistic. If you need to load 2000+ MIDI tracks and 100 virtual instruments, is that practical? No. Is it a convenience? Maybe for some, but not necesary. Hans Zimmer does, but he has an assitant that runs his arsenal of slave computers. I know many pro film/tv composers using moderate setups using Logic X and/or Cubase. It really makes no difference on the DAW, but whatever you are comfortable with...period. I'm forced to use the elusive Pro Tools, but only for delivering final cues to the editors. It's the same with Mac and PC; both are excellent, but it comes down to personal preference (I use both in my studio).
Steve Helstrip wrote:If you're talking about low latency performance and number of instruments, Logic is way out in front. If you need the features that Cubase offers, then Cubase is way out in front! [...] I find Logic to be more stable, but that's a whole other subject!
jluca wrote:Until now Logic is more stable and usable than Cubase.
Orchestra instruments with 10 Kontakt instances 16outs each. PSP plugs, RobPapen synths, Sylent1, IK Stuff, Nebula trough bridge emulation, Ozone, Melodyne, and some external hardware. All works like a charm under Logic, not same in Cubase.
Brock wrote:I work with both. Professionally I use Logic. For my own pursuits I use Cubase. I'll preface this by saying my background is Cubase - from VST through the latest. I've been working with Logic for nearly a year now. I'm know my way around. But still, I HATE the workflow. It should be called Illogic. It's clunky and unintuitive. (I realize this opinion is likely attributably to my background, but I can say I've never been so impeded by a DAW.) It boggles my mind that the program is as popular as it is.
Logic could have quadruple the performance of Cubase (which is what Orchetect is suggesting above), and still, I'd never consider using it for personal purposes.
Wolfie2112 wrote:LOL! I'm in the same boat. I don't know why, but I'm always enticed back to Logic X for some twisted reason. I'm still a longs way from fully understanding it, but it is definitely unintuitive IMO.
Brock wrote:Wolfie2112 wrote:LOL! I'm in the same boat. I don't know why, but I'm always enticed back to Logic X for some twisted reason. I'm still a longs way from fully understanding it, but it is definitely unintuitive IMO.
For me, I use it because I have to for work. Otherwise I'd delete the program. No temptation to use it for personal purposes whatesoever. N-O-N-E.
And I, too, have to disagree with the other poster. For me, Cubase is stable for the most part. I don't have long save times. And the crashing isn't too frequent. What I do work around the crashing is set my autosave to every minute - that way I can't lose too much work.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], jon_blak and 6 guests