Cubase 10 Feedback Survey

[fccfirstclass]

Very nice so far.

[polynasia]

Hey @Matthias,
you can do the feedback query alone without me.
Did you ever click on it yourself? Seems like you like the design of it then.

Making the query barely usable on mobiles AND desktop is really.. I mean it is not even easy to mess this up, right?

I feel this also reflects in your recent product improvements: act but do not check.

2018-12-12_12h52_00.png

(167.72 KiB) Not downloaded yet

[GargoyleStudio]

Yes, difficult to fill in on a mobile device! But I enjoyed doing it and it made me think of things to improve.

Mike.

[Phil Bob]

Hi! I have both element 9.5.41 and pro 10.0.10 Elements now is erased from my comp. i have a big problem with cub10pro. I cannot to freeze any tracks ((( Even with mounted into the cubase vst haloin((( Why it is happen? When a frees any track- cub is hang deadly, so i need to reboot the programm. i am on win 10 operating system.
My config is is: intel coffilake 8100 /16Gb operative/ SSD hard disk 100Gb with 50% oa free space on it
So... my question is?
Why my program cubase 10 pro is not able to freeze any track? It sometimes can- but only 1 time from 10 afforts/
Please answer, couse it is not normal

[BobUpstairs]

I upgraded from 9.5 yesterday but haven’t received an activation code yet. How long should that take? I don’t want to start working with 10 until I’m sure it won’t ‘time-out’ on me....

OK... I got it....

[bouncingbilly]

upgraded to 10.0.10 and it's unusable as it keeps crashing every 5 minutes

[HenJayMusic]

I just took the Survey
#1 Feature I asked for is to "Color the MixConsole to reflect the color tracks in the Project Window"

[cmbsa]

Was gonna do the survey, but format is unusable on mobile phone. Sorry, but its 2019. I do expect something as simple as a survey to work on my iphone.

[kamalski]

C10 would be a really good update, BUT:

1.too many unnecessary changes to tried and tested workflow. nobody who professionally works with ANY software wants to re-learn something that was working perfectly before UNLESS there is a significant improvement!
2.unnecessary changes of GUI purely visual and esthetic with no actual improvement of function. it is detrimental to workflow!
(why change a tool symbol just for the heck of it? DAW's are not a fashion statement! stop trying to please kids and geeks who gawk at "shiny NEW looks"! (Protools is steadfast!)
3.unstable when working with C9.5 projects
4.unstable with some 3rd party plugins
5.lots of bugs already present in C9.5 not fixed.
6. hitpoint detection broken!!
7. Audio Alignment not working properly.
... etc. more bugs in the forum...
8. really looking forward to ARA2 and hope they get it right!

Bottom line: C10 is not useable to me as a professional tool and i am still working with 9.5 and resent the price of this sloppy and misguided update.

[garymusic]

C10 would be a really good update, BUT:


2.unnecessary changes of GUI purely visual and esthetic with no actual improvement of function. it is detrimental to workflow!
(why change a tool symbol just for the heck of it? DAW's are not a fashion statement! stop trying to please kids and geeks who gawk at "shiny NEW looks"! (Protools is steadfast!)

Yes, Pro Tools is the industry standard for a reason. Now that Pro Tools Native is the same price as Cubase, if I was a new DAW customer I would seriously consider PT. I am working with another studio right now and we are recording live in the studio using Pro Tools and I am bringing the tracks back and using AAF format to import the session into Cubase. It works but I miss a lot of what was going on in Pro Tools so it really forced my hand to buy Pro Tools 2018.12. I'm still working in Cubase but there are things that PT does well like vocal comping. I sat there an watched an professional audio engineer just fly through a vocal comp. In no time we had a great track, bounced it, and done. I would love to see Cubase match or exceed what you can do in Pro Tools. The new Project Logical Editor is a good step in that direction. Those commands have to port from one version to another.

Bottom line for me, I don't want to spend time using and struggling with software. I want to make music and do things on my own to save with production costs as it is difficult to make it back on album sales and streaming income.

[hollo321]

Cant stand the new gui. For that reason alone i will not be using version 10, unless they add the option to go back to the previous gui.

[HenJayMusic]

Is there a way to define a Key in Chord Track, and have Chord Track, recommend chords based on that key?
if this feature is not available, I would like this to be added to Steinberg Cubase 10 Pro, wish-list, it would be a great song writing tool.
most songs use only one key....

Thanks

Yes it can with the Chord Assistance which is only available in the Pro Version
All you do is select the first chord and the Chord Assistance will recommend you other chords that will go great with the previous chord and etc.
Watch in here on YouTube @ https://www.youtube.com/embed/3YNld0_hIXE

HenJayMusic: yes I have cubase Pro 10.0.10 , it can still do a scale switch, I would like it to lock to one scale.

Oh that's easy to do ... Just go to the Highlight the Chord Track and go to the Inspector and you should see a "Lock" icon. That will prevent your notes from changing or moving out of scale

Screenshot (24).png

(20.18 KiB) Not downloaded yet

[Sound_Temple_Studios]

To the user who was impressed by how well Protools vocal comping works. I own Protools and Cubase and find the vocal comping in Cubase much better and quicker. Spend some time with it and you might agree. Other features maybe be better in Protools (not many) but for me vocal comping (along with built in tuning functionality) isn't one of them.

[kamalski]

.... I own Protools and Cubase and find the vocal comping in Cubase much better and quicker...

i agree. the comping in Cubase is very fast and flexible, especially in combination with track versions.

[cmbourget]

C10 would be a really good update, BUT:

1.too many unnecessary changes to tried and tested workflow. nobody who professionally works with ANY software wants to re-learn something that was working perfectly before UNLESS there is a significant improvement!
2.unnecessary changes of GUI purely visual and esthetic with no actual improvement of function. it is detrimental to workflow!
(why change a tool symbol just for the heck of it? DAW's are not a fashion statement! stop trying to please kids and geeks who gawk at "shiny NEW looks"! (Protools is steadfast!)
3.unstable when working with C9.5 projects
4.unstable with some 3rd party plugins
5.lots of bugs already present in C9.5 not fixed.
6. hitpoint detection broken!!
7. Audio Alignment not working properly.
... etc. more bugs in the forum...
8. really looking forward to ARA2 and hope they get it right!

Bottom line: C10 is not useable to me as a professional tool and i am still working with 9.5 and resent the price of this sloppy and misguided update.

+1 ! Very good summary. Cubase 10 looks like a game. It's a messy fear at the interface level. I do not know who took control of this Steinberg aspect, but you have to ask the Dorico people for help. Please come back to a serious interface.

[haloinreverse]

Have you guys returned the right click menu (quantize, quantize ends, delete continuous controllers etc.) in the arrangement window from 9.5 back into 10 yet? I haven't bothered installing 10 yet and am still using 9.5 because I simply cannot use Cubase 10 (even though I paid for it) without the right click menu there, it being missing has destroyed my entire work flow. You're supposed to add features with new releases not take important ones away.

[kamalski]

...it being missing has destroyed my entire work flow. You're supposed to add features with new releases not take important ones away.

couldn't agree more!!!
just stop f***ing with the workflow Steinberg!!!

[DrWashington]

I agree: workflow and stability is all-important.

Steinberg: we want you to take this more seriously. Stop breaking features while implementing pretty new buttons. What we want is, first and foremost, a solid, dependable, predictably stable DAW with the features Cubase *already* has, but working thoroughly and properly.

From that solid foundation, go to town on graphics, but if and ONLY if you're not involved in breaking current features! More than anything, we need to be able to rely on foundational features like hitpoint detection to work as expected every time.

The worst thing in the world for every musician who's trying to be a musician (or at least engineer or producer) is to be thrust into the unsolicited role of permanent beta tester for commercial software that we own. That's what I feel like sometimes, and I'd very much like it to stop. Yesterday.

I think many of us would agree: focus on quality first. Literally everything else is secondary, and this is *especially* true for graphical redesigns. Spend more on hiring and retaining competent bug-squashing resources and less on filling out teams responsible for largely unnecessary UI "evolutionary improvements". Less lipstick, less pig. We want and need a rock-solid DAW, first and foremost.

[kamalski]

well said DrWashington!!! +++++++++111111

[Geppastro]

I agree with DrWashington's every single word

+1000000000000000000

[cmbourget]

...it being missing has destroyed my entire work flow. You're supposed to add features with new releases not take important ones away.

couldn't agree more!!!
just stop f***ing with the workflow Steinberg!!!

Steinberg, you will not have one more client with this new interface. But you will have less. So why ? And why break our habits when all was well?

[Ajith]

Hi, I've downloaded Cubase 10 LE as apart of promotion. Its not loading. The terminal pops and says 'You have a mail', vstscanner illegal usage. Can someone help. Mac book pro

[cmbourget]

Cant stand the new gui. For that reason alone i will not be using version 10, unless they add the option to go back to the previous gui.

+1

[cmbourget]

Please remove the light blue from the small print. We do not see anything anymore! Return to the gray of 9.5. Please!

[easybullet3]

It would be so helpful if Cubase Staff would answer questions in these forums (becuase SUpport Tickets have such a slow turn around), and many support tickets get ignored.
The forums are the only place where we can get useful help.
Basically: improve customer service please.