Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

All feature requests and suggestions for upcoming releases of Cubase Pro 10, Cubase Artist 10 and Cubase Elements 10 can be posted here.
User avatar
Matthias Quellmann
Moderator
Posts: 810
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 9:44 am
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

Post by Matthias Quellmann » Fri Jul 26, 2019 1:09 pm

Hi all,,

here are the results

Rank Request (Average points)

1 Gapless Audio Engine (7,90)
2 Move tracks within the mix console (5,66)
3 General Improvements to MIDI editor and Smart tools for MIDI editing (4,72)
4 Bezier curves in midi editor (4,59)
5 Multitrack Audio Warp (4,28)
6 Export to Video (3,73)
7 Smart Tool (3,70)
8 Inspector In Lower Zone Idea - Mockup Design (3,47)
9 Full coloured tracks in the mixconsole (3,37)
10 Audio Connections overhaul or External FX Plugin w/flexible routing (3,03)
11 Allow Free Warp On The Project Window (2,92)
12 Automation saved with TrackVersions (2,76)
13 A proper 'Import Session Data' feature (2,64)
14 Total integration of Dorico (2,44)
15 Tabbed GUI Windows. Namely VST/VSTi Windows (2,42)
16 Plug-in Aliases (2,39)
17 Cubase for Linux (2,33)
18 Multi quick control (2,11)
19 Horizontal mouse wheel should scroll the mix console (1,96)
20 Ripple Edit (1,92)
21 Expression maps UX improvements (1,87)
22 MIDI Editor UI 'Tabs for Controller lanes' (1,85)
23 Better Arpeggiators (1,84)
24 Multiple Track Freeze / Unfreeze (1,82)
25 Save Folder Track Preset, saves all contained tracks+routings (1,78)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
26 Modernize remote control functions (1,76)
27 Eliminate mix console focus (1,61)
28 Improve The 'Save As Template' Function (1,60)
29 Songwriter Tool (1,59)
30 Synchronisation of editing cc data between multiple vsti/midi tracks (1,54)
31 Improve Hardware Remote Plugin Control in Cubase (1,53)
32 The ability to snap to triplets within audio warp (1,34)
33 Save mp3 export ID3 tag settings per project (1,27)
34 Steinberg/Cubase server for quick saving and stability (1,17)
35 Triplet/Dotted grid snap in audio editor (1,15)
36 Clarification of all the remote control features (0,96)
37 Remember the height of each tab in the lower zone (0,81)
38 Per articulation delay parameter for Expression Maps (0,80)
39 'Glue' Key Command (0,78)
40 Turn off Workspace remembering zoom and track height (0,73)
41 Rack presets (0,64)
42 Audio Pool Export (0,54)
43 Transport visible at bottom of Key Editor (0,50)
44 Add option to allow multiple MCU devices to mirror controls (0,50)
45 Video Track Versions (0,36)
46 Info line transpose algo FREE (0,35)
47 Voice control of Cubase transport functions, marker / arranger navigation, looping (0,30)
48 Straight/Parabola Line Tool Key Commandfor each 'Line Type' (0,24)
49 'Show Part Borders' available as key command (0,23)
50 External Synchronization per project not global (0,20)

We will have to refine the rules for the next iteration since a couple of people allocated all of their budget to a single feature. This lead to a high ranking for some features that were only requested by less than 5% of the total participants. Of course this list only represents a fraction of the features requests, but we can add new entries with the next iteration and step by step improve the quality of the results.

Thanks again to all that participated! I really appreciate the positive and constructive discussions. Please keep it up like this!
Matthias Quellmann - Senior Marketing Manager
Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH
Hamburg, Germany
Checkout Steinberg on YouTube, Twitter and Facebook!

skijumptoes
Member
Posts: 284
Joined: Tue May 07, 2019 9:51 pm
Contact:

Re: Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

Post by skijumptoes » Fri Jul 26, 2019 2:45 pm

Wow, just goes to show that a little niggle such as the gapless audio thing actually strikes a chord with more users, so ranks top. Even though it wouldn't be top of most people's lists to fix/improve. I find that really interesting.

Even though what i recommended was low down (44th) i'm really happy with that list.

Was does that mean for the top 25? ...They will be forwarded for review to the team? ..Will we hear anything further? :)

I feel that we have communally given birth and must now care for this child to the point of being over-obsessive parents!
Last edited by skijumptoes on Fri Jul 26, 2019 3:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

GlennO
Member
Posts: 302
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:43 pm
Contact:

Re: Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

Post by GlennO » Fri Jul 26, 2019 2:58 pm

Thanks for doing this Matthias!
Cubase 10, MacOS 10.13, Avid Artist Mix

User avatar
Winter Rat
Member
Posts: 691
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 3:10 pm
Contact:

Re: Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

Post by Winter Rat » Fri Jul 26, 2019 6:59 pm

Great job, Matthias!

But..

I would not like to mention a well-known competitor, but they have a very good feature at the Feature request forum: you can vote for or against each FR and see the results on the main FR page.

At SB forum we can see only how "hot" topic is with no idea how many members really welcome a particular FR.

I know that this has already been said, but...

Regards.
Cubase 9.5
Win 8.1 or Win 10 Pro; Intel Core i7-8700K; Gigabyte GA-Z370 HD3P; 16 GB, 3000 MHz; GeForce GTX 1050.

Funkybot
Member
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2018 2:08 am
Contact:

Re: Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

Post by Funkybot » Fri Jul 26, 2019 7:19 pm

Interesting results. I'd very much like to see a more tightly curated list/survey in any next iterations but this was a great first step.

Gapless wasn't even on my list. Went through that boondoggle with Sonar where it felt for a while every update made the audio engine "more gapless" over time because they never quite got the job completely done. I also kind of equate gapless with begging for instability. True gapless audio without instability would be nice, but it's low priority for me personally (though it's clear I'm in the minority).

#3 and #7 may have even bastardized votes from one another because of the overlap. I suspect if there was a single item that said "Smart Tool for Audio/Midi/Automation" and another for "MIDI PRV improvements" (not sure what those are) the Smart Tool would clearly win out.

#13, #25 and #28 are variations on the same theme with a lot of overlap. The basic problem users are trying to solve is: I want to be able to load some previously created track/instrument templates for quick recall. Maybe a future iteration of the survey could find a good way to combine those by focusing on the problem versus proposing different solutions.

#18, #26, #31 and #36 again all have to do with the same basic premise: users want more/modern remote control options. Again, the next iteration of the survey would benefit from an option that consolidates these into a single item (e.g. "Modernize Remote Control Functions").

From my perspective, there were things on that list that weren't entirely clear to me. A description of the problem and proposed solution right within the survey would really go a long way towards improving the response rates. Same for the idea of having some kind of minimum/maximum to prevent people from stacking a single FR as well as preventing duplicate votes.

Thanks for the hard work Matthias.

User avatar
Starsprinkler
Member
Posts: 259
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 2:35 pm
Contact:

Re: Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

Post by Starsprinkler » Fri Jul 26, 2019 9:48 pm

How many answered the poll?

I found the result surprisingly even below the top. Interesting that just 3 average points were enough to reach top 10, and just two requests reached 5 avg points. Seems to me the community has spread their votes quite broad.

User avatar
Starsprinkler
Member
Posts: 259
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 2:35 pm
Contact:

Re: Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

Post by Starsprinkler » Fri Jul 26, 2019 9:52 pm

Do you have a rank of "request response rates" (or what to call it), i.e. how many percentage of the voters that had a request on his/her voting list at all (regardless of how many points given, they found it useful enough to vote for it)? Would be interesting to see that as well.

Small features often gets lower points, but can still be useful for many people (even if not getting the top points), and can often be implemented with a short amount of time. There are some requests that shouldn't be ignored even if they are on the lower half of the list. If doing a rank as above, they may show up in the upper half (= useful for many).
Last edited by Starsprinkler on Sat Jul 27, 2019 10:19 am, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Stephen57
Senior Member
Posts: 1715
Joined: Sat May 30, 2015 5:32 pm
Location: New York, NY
Contact:

Re: Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

Post by Stephen57 » Fri Jul 26, 2019 10:54 pm

Thanks for doing this. :!:

My own answers in the survey are very much in agreement with the items listed and their priority. Looking forward to future versions.
-------------------------------------------------------
DAW: Cubase Pro 10 (Main), Cubase Pro 9.5 (Backup); PC: HP Z230, i5 CPU quad-core 3.5 Ghz, 16 Gigs RAM; OS: Win 7 Pro 64-bit; Audio Converters, Scarlett 2I4, Zoom UCR-8; USB MIDI Controller, Akai Advance 49. VST-Is: Spectrasonics Omnisphere 2.5, Stylus RMX; Air Music: Hybrid, Transfuser 2, Vacuum Pro, Velvet, Xpand2; Novation: Bass Station; Sonovox Grand Piano; Rack: Proteus 2000, Korg 03R/W, Yamaha TG 33. Monitoring with KRK Rokit 8/G3, Tannoy PBM 6.5 II, Mics. Scheops, Sennheiser, Rode, Lectrosonics RF, etc.

Help with Cubase:
Documentation: https://steinberg.help/
Location/file paths of presets in Cubase and Nuendo: https://helpcenter.steinberg.de/hc/en-u ... nd-Nuendo-
Preferences: https://helpcenter.steinberg.de/hc/en-u ... and-Nuendo

Funkybot
Member
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2018 2:08 am
Contact:

Re: Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

Post by Funkybot » Fri Jul 26, 2019 11:47 pm

I'd like to suggest a feature for the next poll: option for up to 4x upsampling on render. Have an option where Cubase will internally resample any audio and run at a higher sample rate during the render process for reduced aliasing, then resample back down to the original sample rate.

djgraver
Member
Posts: 370
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 10:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

Post by djgraver » Sat Jul 27, 2019 9:00 am

offtopic.

Gapless Audio Engine - can someone explain what is it ?
Win10 x64;Core i5-4670;16GB RAM;SSD system HDD library;Nvidia 1050Ti 4GB
Cubase (always last update)

ozinga
New Member
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2011 2:14 pm
Contact:

Re: Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

Post by ozinga » Sat Jul 27, 2019 9:26 am

djgraver wrote:
Sat Jul 27, 2019 9:00 am
offtopic.

Gapless Audio Engine - can someone explain what is it ?
No glitch, cut out of audio when; moving or selecting tracks, inserting or removing plugins, opening plugin GUI etc.

User avatar
Starsprinkler
Member
Posts: 259
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 2:35 pm
Contact:

Re: Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

Post by Starsprinkler » Sat Jul 27, 2019 10:11 am

Matthias Quellmann wrote:
Fri Jul 26, 2019 1:09 pm
We will have to refine the rules for the next iteration since a couple of people allocated all of their budget to a single feature. This lead to a high ranking for some features that were only requested by less than 5% of the total participants.
Which features got 100 points, thus being ranked to high?

jimzepellin
Junior Member
Posts: 143
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 11:13 pm
Contact:

Re: Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

Post by jimzepellin » Sat Jul 27, 2019 1:17 pm

I think an idea might be to have everyone have to select, say for example five different option out of the list (non-priority), then just add up the selections and you should get a better and fairer result.

Personally, I couldn't find five options that I felt were important enough for me to vote for (personal opinion). But, I think if I was forced to make more choices then it would make me think a bit deeper about other options that might be a good idea even if it's not a priority for me.
If in doubt scream and shout.

simthembile
Junior Member
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2017 1:27 am
Contact:

Re: Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

Post by simthembile » Sat Jul 27, 2019 10:55 pm

Im happy with the results

Quinn3k3
Member
Posts: 297
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 12:45 am
Contact:

Re: Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

Post by Quinn3k3 » Sun Jul 28, 2019 2:57 am

I really like this approach because it forces us focus in on the features that would make the most impact in our particular workflow. Adding a +1 in a thread doesn't really help Steinberg see what are true priorities are in the same way that a poll like this does. Even though some of the features I voted for didn't rank as high as I thought they might, I think the list has some great features on it that I hope make their way into Cubase.

I would be interested to see a percentage of how often each feature was ranked 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th & 5th by users based on the number of points that they allocated to it. I wonder how much that would affect the overall rankings.

Hopefully Steinberg will continue to do these types of polls and maybe a straight 1-5 or 1-10 ranking would be more fair that the 100 point system. In the 1-10 example, our #1 priority would get 10 points, #2 would get 9 points and so on. This would ensure that a few users could not push a feature to the top of the list by throwing all of their points on that specific request.

User avatar
peakae
Grand Senior Member
Posts: 3002
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 8:15 pm
Location: Bedroom
Contact:

Re: Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

Post by peakae » Sun Jul 28, 2019 7:34 pm

Oh well that went as expected, needed features like ripple edit get place 20.
And a feel-good features like gapless audio, gets place 1.
OMG.
How about using the Hub in Cubase for future poll's ?
That would at least reach a bigger audience.
Cubase Pro 10, Wavelab Elements 9, I7 3770K , win10x64, 16Gb Ram, RME Raydat, Steinberg MR816x, Motu 828mkII, Behringer ADA8200, Yamaha moXF6, Steinberg UR242, Yamaha THR 10, Grace Design m900, CMC TP, CMC CH.

skijumptoes
Member
Posts: 284
Joined: Tue May 07, 2019 9:51 pm
Contact:

Re: Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

Post by skijumptoes » Mon Jul 29, 2019 12:06 am

Gapless audio is a big concern for anyone using external gear that’s synchronised to Cubase so don’t dismiss it only as a ‘feel good’ feature. This poll has done ‘a’ job of surveying the community objectively, let’s not beat on it as it’s a progressive step forward.

Just as Rome wasn’t built in a day, if we get behind these methods as a community, rather than judge them selfishly, then we will all achieve greater steps forward.

J Buckingham
Junior Member
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 6:44 am
Contact:

Re: Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

Post by J Buckingham » Mon Jul 29, 2019 3:06 am

skijumptoes wrote:
Mon Jul 29, 2019 12:06 am
Gapless audio is a big concern for anyone using external gear that’s synchronised to Cubase so don’t dismiss it only as a ‘feel good’ feature. This poll has done ‘a’ job of surveying the community objectively, let’s not beat on it as it’s a progressive step forward.

Just as Rome wasn’t built in a day, if we get behind these methods as a community, rather than judge them selfishly, then we will all achieve greater steps forward.
Hear! Hear!
Cubase Pro 10 (Latest), i7 9800x @ 4.2GHz, 128GB RAM, Windows 10 Home, Geforce GTX 1060 3GB

In_Stereo
Senior Member
Posts: 1347
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2016 6:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

Post by In_Stereo » Tue Jul 30, 2019 6:00 pm

skijumptoes wrote:
Fri Jul 26, 2019 2:45 pm
Wow, just goes to show that a little niggle such as the gapless audio thing actually strikes a chord with more users, so ranks top. Even though it wouldn't be top of most people's lists to fix/improve. I find that really interesting.
Based on the amount of responses to posts about it, I would disagree and say that it's a major complaint for many users and is on the top of many people's lists.
Last edited by In_Stereo on Tue Jul 30, 2019 6:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cubase 9.5, Trashcan Mac 6-core 3.7ghz, High Sierra 10.13.4 OS, AMD FirePro D300 Dual, 64 gig RAM, plugins galore, some hardware, a bunch of real instruments and synths, Apollo 8 TB, etc., etc., and two cats

In_Stereo
Senior Member
Posts: 1347
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2016 6:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

Post by In_Stereo » Tue Jul 30, 2019 6:03 pm

peakae wrote:
Sun Jul 28, 2019 7:34 pm
Oh well that went as expected, needed features like ripple edit get place 20.
And a feel-good features like gapless audio, gets place 1.
OMG.
How about using the Hub in Cubase for future poll's ?
That would at least reach a bigger audience.
Gapless audio is not at all merely a feel-good feature for many users, including myself. Though I wish ripple edit were super high up, as well -- it's such a major speed improvement. There are many workflow issues (including gapless audio and ripple edit) that are so important, though every user has different needs of course. My top one of more mix controls (as options) in the track headers (volume, pan, etc.) isn't even on the list, which is a head-scratcher for me because of the significant improvement in workflow and speed it would offer.

One thing is that many users might not realize the benefits they would get from the some of the features, especially those who are beginners or don't do a lot of advanced work. I'm not insulting them at all -- there are all kinds of users, but features such as ripple edit might be lost on a good amount of people who might not understand how significant a feature it is in complicated and larger sessions. Luckily there are plenty of other great ones in high places in the poll.
Last edited by In_Stereo on Tue Jul 30, 2019 6:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cubase 9.5, Trashcan Mac 6-core 3.7ghz, High Sierra 10.13.4 OS, AMD FirePro D300 Dual, 64 gig RAM, plugins galore, some hardware, a bunch of real instruments and synths, Apollo 8 TB, etc., etc., and two cats

In_Stereo
Senior Member
Posts: 1347
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2016 6:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

Post by In_Stereo » Tue Jul 30, 2019 6:09 pm

Matthias Quellmann wrote:
Fri Jul 26, 2019 1:09 pm
Hi all,,

here are the results

Rank Request (Average points)

Thanks again to all that participated! I really appreciate the positive and constructive discussions. Please keep it up like this!
Thank you for this poll Matthias. I was out of town and unable to participate, but this is exciting to see.
Cubase 9.5, Trashcan Mac 6-core 3.7ghz, High Sierra 10.13.4 OS, AMD FirePro D300 Dual, 64 gig RAM, plugins galore, some hardware, a bunch of real instruments and synths, Apollo 8 TB, etc., etc., and two cats

User avatar
MarcoE
New Member
Posts: 38
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 7:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

Post by MarcoE » Fri Aug 02, 2019 1:31 pm

Thanks Matthias! Very informative about how Cubase is used by other users.
Gapless audio seems to bother many users as for me it isn't an issue. I agree with the guy in this forum who mention that this doesn't kill the mojo. Same here.
I'm surprised to see that better controller support is >25. So do people use their controllers mostly to remote trigger Cubase functions and not so much to control VSTs? I would love to see a remote controller setup like NI Traktor Pro does offer. That's 1st class!
But, in general, the list does mirror my vote pretty much...
Cubase Pro 10.0.30 @ Windows 10 Home v1903 @ i9-9900K 32GB @ Gigabyte Z370 HD3P

nevetspots
New Member
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2019 6:59 am

Re: Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

Post by nevetspots » Wed Aug 07, 2019 5:18 pm

25 Save Folder Track Preset, saves all contained tracks+routings (1,78)
and
10 Audio Connections overhaul or External FX Plugin w/flexible routing (3,03)

should most definitely without a doubt, be in the top 5.

In_Stereo
Senior Member
Posts: 1347
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2016 6:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

Post by In_Stereo » Thu Aug 08, 2019 11:36 pm

nevetspots wrote:
Wed Aug 07, 2019 5:18 pm
25 Save Folder Track Preset, saves all contained tracks+routings (1,78)
and
10 Audio Connections overhaul or External FX Plugin w/flexible routing (3,03)

should most definitely without a doubt, be in the top 5.
Everyone has an opinion about what should be in the top 5, including me. Majority rules, I'm afraid.
Cubase 9.5, Trashcan Mac 6-core 3.7ghz, High Sierra 10.13.4 OS, AMD FirePro D300 Dual, 64 gig RAM, plugins galore, some hardware, a bunch of real instruments and synths, Apollo 8 TB, etc., etc., and two cats

nevetspots
New Member
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2019 6:59 am

Re: Feature Request Poll July 2019 - Results

Post by nevetspots » Thu Aug 08, 2019 11:47 pm

In_Stereo wrote:
Thu Aug 08, 2019 11:36 pm
nevetspots wrote:
Wed Aug 07, 2019 5:18 pm
25 Save Folder Track Preset, saves all contained tracks+routings (1,78)
and
10 Audio Connections overhaul or External FX Plugin w/flexible routing (3,03)

should most definitely without a doubt, be in the top 5.
Everyone has an opinion about what should be in the top 5, including me. Majority rules, I'm afraid.
actually logic rules

Post Reply

Return to “Feature Requests and Suggestions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests