[Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Discussions about our next-generation scoring application, Dorico.
Boscoverdi
New Member
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 6:57 pm
Contact:

[Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Post by Boscoverdi » Wed Jun 06, 2018 4:28 pm

What can/can't one do with text in Elements 2, absent the full blown Engraving Mode and Text Flows of Big Dorico?

1. Project Info dialog allows the full range of Dorico score annotations to be entered, but only a subset of those are displayed: title (but not subtitle or dedication); lyricist, composer, copyright. The big issue here is it seems you do not get to choose the typeface. The displayed text items cannot be selected in Write Mode by mouse click. Multi-line text does not appear possible. Thus the common convention of printing songbooks with at right "Words and Music by" and the writer(s) underneath is frustrated.

2. Lyrics, including multi-line lyrics, between staves are perfectly feasible, with optional verse numbering, etc. The Bottom Panel is functional for properties - and there one finds a pleasant surprise: custom font size scaling (and color, if you like that)! A drawback is that selecting lyrics for adjusting the scaling can only be done, it seems, on a per-line basis by a mouse marquee -- a tolerable workflow, IMO (unless you have to set Milton to music ;) ). But you don't get to choose the typeface of lyrics.

3. Staff text and system text is possible (Shift+X, Alt+Shift+X). The good news here is that one has a full set of typeface and font and alignment options, including the possibility of multi-line text, and different attributes for individual characters in that text. This makes it conceivable to try to fudge something similar to the songsheet convention mentioned above, and (with more desperation) a multi-line copyright notice at page bottom. However, these text items are anchored to a note or rest, so reformating the score may throw the positioning awry.

Staff and system texts can be repositioned to some extent by selecting and using Alt+Left/Right Arrow keys. The extent of movement is limited to the horizontal in Elements 2 -- vertical adjustment does not seem possible. You also cannot relocate horizontally further to the left on a staff than the leftmost extent of whatever content is in the first bar in the system -- text is either moved to the previous staff, or stuck over the first note in the first system. Because multiple staff/system texts can be anchored at the same point in the score with collision avoidance to prevent overlaps, there maybe some possibility in tricksing things. YMMV.


I may have overlooked some text features, or got the above wrong in some way(s), as I've been playing with Elements 2 for only a couple of days. Please correct as necessary.

In brief, tho, Elements 2 does not quite yet meet both an intended audience of songwriters and the claim of "publication quality music" (https://www.dorico.com/compare-editions/), if the latter is interpreted broadly to include published songbooks and music rather than merely the staves and dots therein. OTOH, as noted, there are many cases where delivery of a score to the general public is not required, including my own requirement for a musical notepad with polymeter support, so the constraints I find on text are in no way paramount.

Two questions, then:

1. Have I overlooked any important and useful text facility in Elements 2?

2. Do Dorico devs have any plans to de-restrict some of the constraints on the text facilities in Elements 2? For example, to include something like a much simplified version of page-based text frames of Big Dorico.

fkretlow
Member
Posts: 718
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:10 am
Location: Detmold, Germany
Contact:

Re: [Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Post by fkretlow » Wed Jun 06, 2018 10:54 pm

As for selecting lyrics: try to make a block selection (or select just everything) and do Edit > Filter > Lyrics. I guess the filters are not excluded from Dorico Elements, I'm not sure though because I don't have it.

All those text formatting options you miss (including adding more elements of the project info dialog to text frames) are located in Engrave Mode in Dorico Pro so you'll probably have to make do without them.

Unless upgrading to Dorico Pro is an option for you I suggest that you export your scores as pdf and add the additional text elements with another program. Perhaps Inkscape? It's a free editor for vector graphics. I often use it to make small adjustments to my scores that surpass the abilities of the engraving software. I imagine this would be less frustrating than adding a copyright note with a text object that you can't even properly move.
Florian

fkretlow
Member
Posts: 718
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:10 am
Location: Detmold, Germany
Contact:

Re: [Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Post by fkretlow » Wed Jun 06, 2018 11:09 pm

Come to think of it: if you post a picture of what you want your first page to look like, I or someone else here on the forum could make a template with the necessary frames and project info tokens for you. Perhaps the developers would even include a template that fits your needs in a future version.
Florian

User avatar
Vendimion
Junior Member
Posts: 147
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:26 pm
Contact:

Re: [Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Post by Vendimion » Thu Jun 07, 2018 11:05 am

fkretlow wrote:
Wed Jun 06, 2018 10:54 pm
Unless upgrading to Dorico Pro is an option for you I suggest that you export your scores as pdf and add the additional text elements with another program. Perhaps Inkscape? It's a free editor for vector graphics. I often use it to make small adjustments to my scores that surpass the abilities of the engraving software. I imagine this would be less frustrating than adding a copyright note with a text object that you can't even properly move.
What would be the point of doing this and lost time instead of simply not using Dorico Elements but another program that allows to do it?
This is either way frustrating too.
Can't wait to try and see how it could be frustrating or not.
Cubase 9.5 Pro, UR242 | Win 10, I7-4790K @ 4.00GHz, 16Gb | Code61, Motif XS8

fkretlow
Member
Posts: 718
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:10 am
Location: Detmold, Germany
Contact:

Re: [Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Post by fkretlow » Thu Jun 07, 2018 11:30 am

Vendimion wrote:
Thu Jun 07, 2018 11:05 am
What would be the point of doing this and lost time instead of simply not using Dorico Elements but another program that allows to do it?
This is either way frustrating too.
Well. Good point.
Actually, I wasn't aware of the fact that Dorico Elements is so restricted in terms of text handling before I read the OP. This is certainly a major disadvantage.
Florian

User avatar
Vendimion
Junior Member
Posts: 147
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:26 pm
Contact:

Re: [Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Post by Vendimion » Thu Jun 07, 2018 12:45 pm

I believe that it should be at least equal, if not better, than MuseScore2 to make it worthwhile, don't you think?
Cubase 9.5 Pro, UR242 | Win 10, I7-4790K @ 4.00GHz, 16Gb | Code61, Motif XS8

fkretlow
Member
Posts: 718
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:10 am
Location: Detmold, Germany
Contact:

Re: [Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Post by fkretlow » Thu Jun 07, 2018 12:58 pm

Hm. I suppose I do.
And many things certainly are better than MS. All the underlying algorithms, the spacing engine... Then again... I can't see myself spending 100 € for a notation software where I can't freely add and position text frames. No way.
Florian

pianoleo
Grand Senior Member
Posts: 5033
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:17 am
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Re: [Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Post by pianoleo » Thu Jun 07, 2018 1:18 pm

But surely one of the points of Dorico Elements is to persuade people to buy Dorico Pro?!
Pianist/accompanist/engraver/arranger
2015 Macbook Pro 13" Retina 3.1ghz dual-core i7, 8gb RAM; running Sibelius Ultimate, Logic Pro X, Dorico 3 etc.
& 2017 HP ZBook Studio G3 15.6” UHD quad-i7, 16gb RAM, Windows 10 Pro
Sibelius user since Sibelius 7 (Acorn, 1997), Ex-Sibelius user since Dorico 1.0

benwiggy
Senior Member
Posts: 1325
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 8:09 pm
Contact:

Re: [Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Post by benwiggy » Thu Jun 07, 2018 1:52 pm

pianoleo wrote:
Thu Jun 07, 2018 1:18 pm
But surely one of the points of Dorico Elements is to persuade people to buy Dorico Pro?!
Some would say the only point! Nearly every "Lite" version is a gateway drug to the full product. The limitations are always arbitrary, and when you hit the limits, your only choice is to move up to the Pro product.
MacMini 2018, 3GHz i5, 32Gb RAM | MacBook Pro 2014, 2.2 GHz i7 | Garritan Personal Orchestra 5
Ancient Groove Music

User avatar
Daniel at Steinberg
Moderator
Posts: 12780
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 10:35 am
Contact:

Re: [Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Post by Daniel at Steinberg » Thu Jun 07, 2018 3:33 pm

From the original post:
Boscoverdi wrote:The big issue here is it seems you do not get to choose the typeface.
In fact, you can: in the Preferences dialog you can choose the default text font for new projects, so if you change that before you start a new project, all of the text both in frames and more generally around the score will use the text font family you choose there.
Boscoverdi wrote:Do Dorico devs have any plans to de-restrict some of the constraints on the text facilities in Elements 2? For example, to include something like a much simplified version of page-based text frames of Big Dorico.
To the extent that these things would require the addition of Engrave mode to Dorico Elements, the answer is no: but it may become possible to do some of the other things that you mention (e.g. adding carriage returns in the various fields in Project Info) in the future.

Boscoverdi
New Member
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 6:57 pm
Contact:

Re: [Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Post by Boscoverdi » Thu Jun 07, 2018 8:31 pm

fkretlow wrote:
Wed Jun 06, 2018 10:54 pm
As for selecting lyrics: try to make a block selection (or select just everything) and do Edit > Filter > Lyrics. I guess the filters are not excluded from Dorico Elements, I'm not sure though because I don't have it.
Good call. It appears Elements retains most if not all of the filters of Dorico.

fkretlow wrote:...export your scores as pdf and add the additional text elements with another program.
Yes, useful suggestion, and something I already do when sending out manuals for professional printing.

Daniel at Steinberg wrote:
Thu Jun 07, 2018 3:33 pm
From the original post:
Boscoverdi wrote:The big issue here is it seems you do not get to choose the typeface.
In fact, you can: in the Preferences dialog you can choose the default text font for new projects, so if you change that before you start a new project, all of the text both in frames and more generally around the score will use the text font family you choose there.
This is true, but one must set the typeface before starting the new project; once under way, there seems no way to choose something different for that project. This will bite people, as it's not the expected behaviour for editor software.

Daniel at Steinberg wrote:
Boscoverdi wrote:Do Dorico devs have any plans to de-restrict some of the constraints on the text facilities in Elements 2? For example, to include something like a much simplified version of page-based text frames of Big Dorico.
To the extent that these things would require the addition of Engrave mode to Dorico Elements, the answer is no: but it may become possible to do some of the other things that you mention (e.g. adding carriage returns in the various fields in Project Info) in the future.
I appreciate your need for product differentiation.

However, Elements allows extensive typeface attribute selection for Staff and System text. I wonder if this facility could be leveraged? As these items presumably have location coordinates in their underlying data structures, my thought is that permitted items from the Project Info dialog (such as title, etc) could be treated as a type of System text object albeit with unique private virtual location identifiers. Their uniqueness would allow for them to be painted at specific places only; their privacy would ensure an end-user couldn't hijack them to simulate Big Dorico's text flows; and their virtuality (?) would distinguish them to the layout engine.

User avatar
Daniel at Steinberg
Moderator
Posts: 12780
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 10:35 am
Contact:

Re: [Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Post by Daniel at Steinberg » Thu Jun 07, 2018 11:37 pm

I think we probably are being unnecessarily restrictive in preventing you from simply double-clicking on the text items in the fixed frames for title, composer, lyricist and copyright and not allowing you to edit these directly, even if you can't create new frames or move the current ones around. So I will look at allowing this kind of editing in Write mode in the next little bug fix update, which will be coming relatively soon.

User avatar
Vendimion
Junior Member
Posts: 147
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:26 pm
Contact:

Re: [Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Post by Vendimion » Fri Jun 08, 2018 7:40 am

Daniel at Steinberg wrote:
Thu Jun 07, 2018 11:37 pm
I think we probably are being unnecessarily restrictive in preventing you from simply double-clicking on the text items in the fixed frames for title, composer, lyricist and copyright and not allowing you to edit these directly, even if you can't create new frames or move the current ones around. So I will look at allowing this kind of editing in Write mode in the next little bug fix update, which will be coming relatively soon.
Hey Daniel, honestly that would not be luxury, those limitations seems a bit frustrating to me but thank you anyway for taking part to the discussion and thinking about it.
Cubase 9.5 Pro, UR242 | Win 10, I7-4790K @ 4.00GHz, 16Gb | Code61, Motif XS8

User avatar
Daniel at Steinberg
Moderator
Posts: 12780
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 10:35 am
Contact:

Re: [Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Post by Daniel at Steinberg » Fri Jun 08, 2018 8:48 am

I’m not suggesting it would be luxury, but Dorico Elements is not meant to be a luxury product! However, with that change you will at least be able to have total control over what text appears in the key areas of the page (the title area, the header/footer, and the upper left/right areas for composer, lyricist, and so on).

leigh_d
Junior Member
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:08 am
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Contact:

Re: [Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Post by leigh_d » Fri Jun 08, 2018 5:51 pm

Daniel at Steinberg wrote:
Thu Jun 07, 2018 3:33 pm
From the original post:
Boscoverdi wrote:The big issue here is it seems you do not get to choose the typeface.
In fact, you can: in the Preferences dialog you can choose the default text font for new projects, so if you change that before you start a new project, all of the text both in frames and more generally around the score will use the text font family you choose there.
Can I have Elements use Petaluma Text for the music font instead of Bravura Text?

**Leigh
Hope is not the conviction that something will turn out well but the certainty that something is worth doing no matter how it turns out.— Vaclav Havel

iMac 3.4 GHz/i7, 32GB RAM, Mac OS X 10.14.6 Dorico Pro 3 & Elements 3
VI Pro 2, VE Pro 7, MIR Pro, UVI Falcon, EZ Keys, EZ Drummer, Garritan, Izotope RX 6 Advanced, DigitalPerformer 10, Metric Halo ULN-8-3D, ULN-2-3D & 2882-3D interfaces

User avatar
Daniel at Steinberg
Moderator
Posts: 12780
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 10:35 am
Contact:

Re: [Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Post by Daniel at Steinberg » Fri Jun 08, 2018 10:29 pm

Not at the moment, because I believe the Music Fonts dialog is not currently included in Elements (it's in the Engrave menu, which is not included in Elements, obviously enough), but we are thinking about making the Music Fonts dialog available in e.g. the Edit menu so that you can change between Bravura and Petaluma easily in Elements.

User avatar
Vendimion
Junior Member
Posts: 147
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:26 pm
Contact:

Re: [Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Post by Vendimion » Tue Jul 10, 2018 8:55 am

Daniel at Steinberg wrote:
Fri Jun 08, 2018 10:29 pm
Not at the moment, because I believe the Music Fonts dialog is not currently included in Elements (it's in the Engrave menu, which is not included in Elements, obviously enough), but we are thinking about making the Music Fonts dialog available in e.g. the Edit menu so that you can change between Bravura and Petaluma easily in Elements.
Does this mean that for now in Elements we can't change or add any texts or chords symbols ??
Cubase 9.5 Pro, UR242 | Win 10, I7-4790K @ 4.00GHz, 16Gb | Code61, Motif XS8

User avatar
Daniel at Steinberg
Moderator
Posts: 12780
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 10:35 am
Contact:

Re: [Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Post by Daniel at Steinberg » Tue Jul 10, 2018 9:09 am

No, you can still add text with Shift+X, system text with Shift+Alt+X, and chord symbols with Shift+Q, just like you can in Dorico Pro.

User avatar
Vendimion
Junior Member
Posts: 147
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:26 pm
Contact:

Re: [Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Post by Vendimion » Wed Jul 11, 2018 4:06 pm

Daniel at Steinberg wrote:
Tue Jul 10, 2018 9:09 am
No, you can still add text with Shift+X, system text with Shift+Alt+X, and chord symbols with Shift+Q, just like you can in Dorico Pro.
Thanks Daniel for letting me know.
Could you please tell me how can I switch from a D# to a E? I have loaded a melody from one of my Cubase project to first try Dorico, added the key signature, Gmin, but still all Eb and Gb notes are shown as D# and F#, I can't figure how to select and simply move the sharp notes one step up on the staff ??
Thanks
Cubase 9.5 Pro, UR242 | Win 10, I7-4790K @ 4.00GHz, 16Gb | Code61, Motif XS8

User avatar
MarcLarcher
Grand Senior Member
Posts: 3035
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2016 9:38 am
Location: France
Contact:

Re: [Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Post by MarcLarcher » Wed Jul 11, 2018 4:39 pm

There are controls to rewrite the enharmonic. It should br Alt+[whatever key you press to make # or b].
To move the pitch in Dorico it's as easy as pressing alt-arrow (up or down)
Last edited by MarcLarcher on Wed Jul 11, 2018 5:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
OS X 10.13.6, macbook pro retina Late 2013
Opera singer (lyric tenor), photographer, sound engineer, XeLaTeX user and music engraver (Dorico Pro 3, and Photoscore Ultimate)
French is my native language

User avatar
Vendimion
Junior Member
Posts: 147
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:26 pm
Contact:

Re: [Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Post by Vendimion » Wed Jul 11, 2018 5:04 pm

MarcLarcher wrote:
Wed Jul 11, 2018 4:39 pm
There are controls to rewrite the enharmonic. It should br Alt+Shift+[whatever key you press to make # or b].
To move the pitch in Dorico it's as easy as pressing alt-arrow (up or down)
Couldn't figure how to rewirte enharmonic with Alt+Shift+the key but I moved the notes with Alt-arrow.
Merci Marc!
Cubase 9.5 Pro, UR242 | Win 10, I7-4790K @ 4.00GHz, 16Gb | Code61, Motif XS8

User avatar
MarcLarcher
Grand Senior Member
Posts: 3035
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2016 9:38 am
Location: France
Contact:

Re: [Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Post by MarcLarcher » Wed Jul 11, 2018 5:39 pm

Sorry, I think there's no sift key involved. I edit my post 😉
OS X 10.13.6, macbook pro retina Late 2013
Opera singer (lyric tenor), photographer, sound engineer, XeLaTeX user and music engraver (Dorico Pro 3, and Photoscore Ultimate)
French is my native language

User avatar
Vendimion
Junior Member
Posts: 147
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:26 pm
Contact:

Re: [Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Post by Vendimion » Thu Jul 12, 2018 5:24 pm

Daniel at Steinberg wrote:
Tue Jul 10, 2018 9:09 am
No, you can still add text with Shift+X, system text with Shift+Alt+X, and chord symbols with Shift+Q, just like you can in Dorico Pro.
It is really a small detail but when adding Chord symbol, e.g. Gmin/A, it automatically converts it to Gm/A, is it possible anyway to show Gmin/A ??

I have a little issue, I have loaded an organ melody in midi file from a Cubase project, in some measures like measure 17 (see attachment), in the treble clef, the upper D is missing and when adding it manually in Write mode it insert the note but replaces the D below ?? I hope my explanation make sense?

I am only working on making beautiful score sheet but until now I really appraciate the Elements version.
Attachments
Mea_17 Dorico.JPG
(54.82 KiB) Not downloaded yet
Mea_17 Cubase.JPG
(56.44 KiB) Not downloaded yet
Last edited by Vendimion on Thu Jul 12, 2018 8:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cubase 9.5 Pro, UR242 | Win 10, I7-4790K @ 4.00GHz, 16Gb | Code61, Motif XS8

User avatar
MarcLarcher
Grand Senior Member
Posts: 3035
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2016 9:38 am
Location: France
Contact:

Re: [Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Post by MarcLarcher » Thu Jul 12, 2018 5:38 pm

Dear Vendimion,
If you want Fmin to appear, you have to pick the right option in Engraving options > Chord symbols !
Image

If you want to have multiple notes on a single voice, you need to engage the chord mode (q without shift), you'll see you can add the high D over the other.
I recommend that you watch carefully all the videos from Anthony Hughes for the Youtube channel, you will lear MANY useful things ;-)
Attachments
Capture d’écran 2018-07-12 à 18.36.59.png
(25.8 KiB) Not downloaded yet
OS X 10.13.6, macbook pro retina Late 2013
Opera singer (lyric tenor), photographer, sound engineer, XeLaTeX user and music engraver (Dorico Pro 3, and Photoscore Ultimate)
French is my native language

User avatar
Vendimion
Junior Member
Posts: 147
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:26 pm
Contact:

Re: [Elements] Text facilities and constraints

Post by Vendimion » Thu Jul 12, 2018 8:46 pm

Alright Marc, I'll do for sure!
Thanks.
Cubase 9.5 Pro, UR242 | Win 10, I7-4790K @ 4.00GHz, 16Gb | Code61, Motif XS8

Post Reply

Return to “Dorico”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Albione, dankreider, lemon-kun, MarcLarcher, Pietzcker, PjotrB, tcreverb, TootSweet and 6 guests