Yes, thanks, I’m aware of that page. I’m rather trying to gee up Steinberg into ratifying 9.5.x on 1809.
You say this is a user support forum. Well it’s address starts with www.steinberg.net, and Steinberg people are here, so why no response in 2 months?
This is a dilemma, as Microsoft will sooner or later force the update to 1809, yet at the moment I have an almost perfectly performing 9.5.21 on 1803.
I don’t think it’s too much to ask for Steinberg to test 9.5.x on 1809. Especially as it is still very early days for CB10 and there are noted problems. Why should I be forced to move to a system which is documented as being more problematic than what I have now?