Piledriver or Bulldozer!? Lol… no, new cooler.
I have my Ryzen 1700 (no-“x”) running with the stock cooler in an Antec case, no noise. Overclock without doing anything fancy on all cores to 3.7GHz.
With the new AMD cpus and the APUs, does Cubase 10 make use of any of these new APU technologies and functionality like Zen+ or DirectX12? I am under the impression that Cubase 10 is more graphics resource hungry but nowhere near what a computer game is; so is having a APU better for Cubase DAW usage and performance or is it still better to have a dedicated video card/graphics chip in the system, or it doesn’t really matter because Cubase is not a game anyways? Just curious.
As far as I understand it for the GUI a gpu is a gpu, regardless of whether it’s integrated (in an APU) or dedicated (in card). In other words they should provide a certain performance for the GUI based on the specs and should provide certain outputs. I don’t know of any decent DAW that currently uses graphic processors for any type of audio processing.
The one thing to remember though is that because both CPUs and APUs for consumers use the same socket it means they’re the same size, and because the gpu now takes up some of the space in an APU we should expect to see fewer CPU cores in APUs, i.e. less actual audio performance - all else being equal. On top of that the AMD APUs seem to have been targeted towards more of a value-segment of the market and seem to have been coming out on the market quite a bit later.
So I would probably steer clear of APUs for a powerful DAW at least… Although it surely depends on how we define “powerful” and what type of work we’re going to do