Why people are moving away from Cubase

General discussions on songwriting, mixing, music business and other music related topics.
trashdinner
Member
Posts: 212
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 1:43 am
Contact:

Why people are moving away from Cubase

Post by trashdinner » Sat Oct 08, 2016 10:12 pm

I work in the video game industry and I've noticed that A LOT of people are moving away from Cubase.
There are a couple of reasons for this but I thought I'd give the main ones so Steinberg can (hopefully) fix those things and bring back their users.

We're talking about sound designers, composers, audio mixers and post prod guys.

Obviously, the post prod guys aren't working with Cubase because of the lack of Edit Mode (video preview follows when you move or resize an event). They use Pro tools since Nuendo is stupidly expensive and pro tools does this perfectly.
Steiny could easily bring that feature to Cubase or lower Nuendo's price of 800$ :/

Most of the sound designers are now using Reaper because of how easy and fast it is to batch export multiple clips even if they are on the same track. Most of them will often have many sounds in one session and they want to export them all easily while keeping their exact lengh ect. Reaper does that in a breeze.

Composers are also using reaper because of how DSP heavy Cubase got with every new versions. You can easily load twice as much plugins in Reaper with the same setup (we did the test) and every actions seem to be faster and snappier. Reaper rarely crashes even in big sessions so they almost all made the switch.

I'm still a Cubase user at home but I think it's sad to see how Steinberg seems to ignore those issues/features when it's just common sense for people in the industry.

User avatar
MrSoundman
Senior Member
Posts: 2451
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 3:27 am
Contact:

Re: Why people are moving away from Cubase

Post by MrSoundman » Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:51 am

trashdinner wrote:Obviously, the post prod guys aren't working with Cubase because of the lack of Edit Mode
Hopefully there is a big re-write of the video code under way following the ditching of QuickTime that should offer the opportunity to deal with many other issues as well; I will be very disappointed if the December release of Cubase (a.k.a. Nuendo beta) doesn't have a good video engine.
trashdinner wrote:I'm still a Cubase user at home but I think it's sad to see how Steinberg seems to ignore those issues/features when it's just common sense for people in the industry.
I hear you on Reaper, which I also use and have been a fan of since V1, but it doesn't stop me using Cubase; these are tools, not mutually exclusive religions. I would not worry about any perceived "moving away" from Cubase in your specific sector, the people who worry about that are somewhere in a plush office in Japan and have much more information about where the market for Cubase is than any of us.
Windows 10 • Cubase 10.5.12 • WaveLab 10.0.20 • SpectraLayers 6.0.30 • HALion 6.3.1 • Groove Agent 5.0.20 • Midex

User avatar
Rumdrum
Member
Posts: 541
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 1:08 am
Contact:

Re: Why people are moving away from Cubase

Post by Rumdrum » Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:55 am

I am sad to read that you have bad experiences. However I am not. Over the years I have followed this forum I have continuously read posts about problems and posts that contradict. People just have different experiences. I am not sure at "all that people" are moving away from Cubase (or Nuendo for that matter). It cannot be confirmed by the representatives in the industry that I know. However I know just a handful. So please tell me exactly how many people you know that are moving away from Cubase? 1, 10, 100???? How many exactly are "most of the sound designers" that is using Reaper? As I find Reaper pretty useless they must have understood something I have not, and safety in numbers. So if it is many, (however not sure how many that makes up "many") I'll give it a new go.
Mac Pro - Maverics 3,2Ghz - 20GB RAM - 22TB Disc, Cubase 8,5 + 4.5 (on PC/XP), Wavelab 9, iPad Remote, RME Hammerfall RAYDAT, Yamaha01V96, and a bucket of ice cream.

trashdinner
Member
Posts: 212
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: Why people are moving away from Cubase

Post by trashdinner » Sun Oct 09, 2016 1:38 am

I love Cubase but I must admit that the performance is a lot worst than it used to be. Open a session in Cubase 6 and open it in 8.5 ... you'll see you DSP meter jump up. Reaper is just a beast in that department but man is it ugly.

I personally hate Pro Tools but I have to work with it at the office and it annoys me to see that it has a lot more post prod and video features than Cubase. Pro tools dominates in the commercial studios and in the post prod world and that needs to change imho.

When I say a lot of people I'm talking about 15 people out of 20 switched to Reaper for a lot of reasons (DSP, batch export, apply plugins on clips directly ect). For sound designers these features are godsend.

That being said, I don't know how it looks like in other companies but it doesn't look too good on our side.
I hope Steinberg will take these things seriously.

User avatar
Fabio Bartolini
Moderator
Posts: 1347
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:55 am
Contact:

Re: Why people are moving away from Cubase

Post by Fabio Bartolini » Sun Oct 09, 2016 11:02 am

I'll be brief. I don't mean to sound rude, it's just sunday :-)

1. Off topic, moving to the Lounge

2. We had a lot of people moving TO Cubase, especially Pro 8.5 (and Nuendo 7, in the game industry). Figures varies a lot form country to country, though, the user's relative perception as well

3. We entered roughly 20000 issues / requests / improvement tasks for the Cubase Pro 8 / 8.5 line alone - seeing that this is perceived as 'ignoring' is kind of sad, although we know that the user don't -and can't- know how much work developers, planners, testers and support as well have to deal with. Still, we do understand that every user has different requirements and what has been done may be great to some and poor to others.
Last edited by Fabio Bartolini on Sun Oct 09, 2016 11:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Some adjustments
Fabio Bartolini - Test Engineer
Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH
Hamburg, Germany

PC1: Gigabyte Z390 Gaming X, i7-8700K, 16GB Corsair DDR4 2666MHz, Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+ 8GB, Windows 10 Pro
PC2: GA-Z170-Gaming K3, i7-6700K, 16GB Corsair DDR4 2133MHz, ASUS Dual GTX 1060 6GB, Windows 10 (8.1 and 7 Pro backwards comp.)
PC3: GA-H97-HD3, i5-4690K, 16GB Corsair DDR3 1600MHz, Sapphire RX 570 Pulse 4GB, Windows 10 Pro (7 Pro backwards comp.)
Office DAW 1: GA-X570 Gaming X, Ryzen 7 3700X, 16GB HyperX DDR4 3200MHz, Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB, Windows 10 Pro
Office DAW 2: Mac Mini 2018, i7 3.2 GHz, 32GB DDR4, Intel HD 630, MacOS Catalina

User avatar
NoMad92
Member
Posts: 371
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 10:56 am
Location: Paris FR
Contact:

Re: Why people are moving away from Cubase

Post by NoMad92 » Sun Oct 09, 2016 11:21 am

Fabio Bartolini wrote: 2. We had a lot of people moving TO Cubase, especially Pro 8.5 (and Nuendo 7, in the game industry). Figures varies a lot form country to country, though, the user's relative perception as well
LOL that kind of answer ... "people do love us se we dont have to get better and listen to customers will"

After a good laugh bout that answer...I remember that the industry standard since few years is AbletonLive, for any kind os music genre and for gaming music. Every brand is developping hardware for Ableton, not Cubase...every soundbank comes with a drumrack (ableton live) not a G.A.se rack !!!
Same for Halion, sold 350€ thaugh there are nearly 0 soundbank developpers for Halion, Kontakt though has every banks you could wish.

I think that that behavior toward customers (i've had some not so nice relations with the Steiny twitter CM, and here to) that makes people go see if the grass is greener else where, especially when a software is the standard, that everybody talks about, or make video courses on (300 out of 305 videos tutos (pro) are on Live not Cubase/Nuendo).

So let me laugh again bout that "a lot of people move TO cubase" ... Cubase has not even a simple sampler like FLstudio or AbletonLive !!!
Win10 creator 64bit, 16gb, i5-2550
DAW: Cubase 10.5
Hardware: Steinberg UR 12, Nektar Panorama P4, Akai MPD226
VSTs: UVI Falcon, VPS Avenger, Sylenth1

User avatar
NoMad92
Member
Posts: 371
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 10:56 am
Location: Paris FR
Contact:

Re: Why people are moving away from Cubase

Post by NoMad92 » Sun Oct 09, 2016 11:32 am

Fabio Bartolini wrote: 3. We entered roughly 20000 issues / requests / improvement tasks for the Cubase Pro 8 / 8.5 line alone - seeing that this is perceived as 'ignoring' is kind of sad, although we know that the user don't -and can't- know how much work developers, planners, testers and support as well have to deal with. Still, we do understand that every user has different requirements and what has been done may be great to some and poor to others.
BTW, that "everyone needs are diff thats why we dont solve some things sometimes", well how about that AOTmixer topic started in 2014 (just to set it we are in 2016, nearly 17)... viewtopic.php?f=228&t=69912
90% of users are backing the topic, yet NO AOT MIXER !!!
So please stop taking us for fools (and for our money only)...listen to us, show the customers you hear what they need, and do the changes nearly every users ask !!!
(plus for functions asked and steiny says "maybe not everyone will use that", well just put the otpion to activate or deactivate so everyone is happy)

I really is asking myself bout keeping loyalty to Steinberg with all those little customers "disrespect"...if you were giving a free daw, nobody would complain !!! Though it is not free...so make people go to Live or Reaper that's a very good company move !!!
Win10 creator 64bit, 16gb, i5-2550
DAW: Cubase 10.5
Hardware: Steinberg UR 12, Nektar Panorama P4, Akai MPD226
VSTs: UVI Falcon, VPS Avenger, Sylenth1

User avatar
Rumdrum
Member
Posts: 541
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 1:08 am
Contact:

Re: Why people are moving away from Cubase

Post by Rumdrum » Sun Oct 09, 2016 11:58 am

NoMad92 wrote:
Fabio Bartolini wrote: 3. We entered roughly 20000 issues / requests / improvement tasks for the Cubase Pro 8 / 8.5 line alone - seeing that this is perceived as 'ignoring' is kind of sad, although we know that the user don't -and can't- know how much work developers, planners, testers and support as well have to deal with. Still, we do understand that every user has different requirements and what has been done may be great to some and poor to others.
BTW, that "everyone needs are diff thats why we dont solve some things sometimes", well how about that AOTmixer topic started in 2014 (just to set it we are in 2016, nearly 17)... viewtopic.php?f=228&t=69912
90% of users are backing the topic, yet NO AOT MIXER !!!
So please stop taking us for fools (and for our money only)...listen to us, show the customers you hear what they need, and do the changes nearly every users ask !!!
(plus for functions asked and steiny says "maybe not everyone will use that", well just put the otpion to activate or deactivate so everyone is happy)

I really is asking myself bout keeping loyalty to Steinberg with all those little customers "disrespect"...if you were giving a free daw, nobody would complain !!! Though it is not free...so make people go to Live or Reaper that's a very good company move !!!
Due to customer claims I have 6 DAWs installed, Reaper and Live among them, I would say I am fairly aqainted with most of them. For my own projects I use Cubase 99%. The last 1% goes to Logic (version 9 that is) that does something Cubase cannot. If somebody comes to me and want to use Live, I am thinking "oh my god not again". I really hate it. One is not better than the other, but the one is preferred above the other by ME and the other by YOU. Isn't it nice that the different developers have different approaches to their products? So that both you and I can have a DAW we are quite satisfied with? Why whish Cubase would become Live? You already have Live. Put your money there. Nobody forces you to continue to put your money into Cubase or any other Steinberg product. Obviously you are right when you are comparing available AddOns for Kontakt vs Halion. Most looses compared to Kontakt, including UVI, However there are areas where UVI clearly wins (more complex instruments). Kontakt being better for most developers does not make neither Halion nor UVI obsolete. I agree that Groove Agent is poor compared to say Toontrack, however many seem to love it, and even if it is a puzzle to me, if they create music from it, that is the most important part.
Mac Pro - Maverics 3,2Ghz - 20GB RAM - 22TB Disc, Cubase 8,5 + 4.5 (on PC/XP), Wavelab 9, iPad Remote, RME Hammerfall RAYDAT, Yamaha01V96, and a bucket of ice cream.

User avatar
NoMad92
Member
Posts: 371
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 10:56 am
Location: Paris FR
Contact:

Re: Why people are moving away from Cubase

Post by NoMad92 » Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:32 pm

To be specific I dont want Cubase to be Live, I want Cubase to learn from others too !!!
I want mostly, them to listen to us more than they do (that AOTmixer topic, is the real example of them ignoring us)...so i compared this to Live cause most of Live users says that customer service is listening to their needs !!!

I didnt compared Halion TO Kontakt, but the lack of 3rd party company. Thats a sign that companies doesnt acknoledge Halion at all !!!
I said its a sign to show the interest of companies to a product. Like when i said most of the pro tutos are about Live. Thats a sign that it's the one being the industry standard. Like Protools is the industry standard in post prod, in 95 oyut of 100 pro studios. Its not Cubase or Nuendo !

I still use Cubase, so dont take that like a hater, take those statements like a disappointed paying user !!! I would love to see Cubase evolving the way users need it, not like the dev wants to see it !

So my last thing is check the topic started in 2014, about a problem that, well even you im sure, 90% of users complain about: AlwaysOnTop mixer (like it was before !!! why did they removed that simple function? they does even explain why they did, or why they dont change it back...so we (customers) fill left aside)
Win10 creator 64bit, 16gb, i5-2550
DAW: Cubase 10.5
Hardware: Steinberg UR 12, Nektar Panorama P4, Akai MPD226
VSTs: UVI Falcon, VPS Avenger, Sylenth1

User avatar
Fabio Bartolini
Moderator
Posts: 1347
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:55 am
Contact:

Re: Why people are moving away from Cubase

Post by Fabio Bartolini » Sun Oct 09, 2016 2:06 pm

NoMad92 wrote: LOL that kind of answer ... "people do love us se we dont have to get better and listen to customers will"
These are words you put in my mouth and gathered from my answer and I assure you, wrongly.

I also have a hard time understanding how you can that easily list usage percentages which are wildly different from continent to continent and from country to country. However, I'm no sales or marketing guy, I'll just leave it at this.

On a more tech side. As I tried to explain several times, the new mixer handling and behaviour are due to the introduction of independent windows, possibly one of the top user requests ever. Luis and Guillermo stated elsewhere that the request has been forwarded and looked into - my understanding is, AOT will be re-introduced if a solution that will not send all plug-ins' GUIs behind the mixer is found. Plug-ins hiding behind the mixer was one of the biggest complaints in the 7/7.5 iteration, hundreds of times more than the complaints about the current behaviour - which does not mean lack of will to improve it, nor that it is perfect.
Fabio Bartolini - Test Engineer
Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH
Hamburg, Germany

PC1: Gigabyte Z390 Gaming X, i7-8700K, 16GB Corsair DDR4 2666MHz, Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+ 8GB, Windows 10 Pro
PC2: GA-Z170-Gaming K3, i7-6700K, 16GB Corsair DDR4 2133MHz, ASUS Dual GTX 1060 6GB, Windows 10 (8.1 and 7 Pro backwards comp.)
PC3: GA-H97-HD3, i5-4690K, 16GB Corsair DDR3 1600MHz, Sapphire RX 570 Pulse 4GB, Windows 10 Pro (7 Pro backwards comp.)
Office DAW 1: GA-X570 Gaming X, Ryzen 7 3700X, 16GB HyperX DDR4 3200MHz, Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB, Windows 10 Pro
Office DAW 2: Mac Mini 2018, i7 3.2 GHz, 32GB DDR4, Intel HD 630, MacOS Catalina

User avatar
Rumdrum
Member
Posts: 541
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 1:08 am
Contact:

Re: Why people are moving away from Cubase

Post by Rumdrum » Sun Oct 09, 2016 3:32 pm

NoMad92 wrote:To be specific I dont want Cubase to be Live, I want Cubase to learn from others too !!!
I want mostly, them to listen to us more than they do (that AOTmixer topic, is the real example of them ignoring us)...so i compared this to Live cause most of Live users says that customer service is listening to their needs !!!

I didnt compared Halion TO Kontakt, but the lack of 3rd party company. Thats a sign that companies doesnt acknoledge Halion at all !!!
I said its a sign to show the interest of companies to a product. Like when i said most of the pro tutos are about Live. Thats a sign that it's the one being the industry standard. Like Protools is the industry standard in post prod, in 95 oyut of 100 pro studios. Its not Cubase or Nuendo !

I still use Cubase, so dont take that like a hater, take those statements like a disappointed paying user !!! I would love to see Cubase evolving the way users need it, not like the dev wants to see it !

So my last thing is check the topic started in 2014, about a problem that, well even you im sure, 90% of users complain about: AlwaysOnTop mixer (like it was before !!! why did they removed that simple function? they does even explain why they did, or why they dont change it back...so we (customers) fill left aside)
But please get that THIS USER is satisfied with the mixer. THIS USER is satisfied with Cubase the way it is (on almost every functions). YOUR desires will IMO destroy what I was hoping Cubase would be over the years. I dont want Cubase to "learn" anything from any other DAW (at least as it is now). It has not been like that all of the time. Cubase has learned over the years and developed into a very satisfying product. Where did you think that development came from. Not listening to the users? Do you think the Steinberg developers spent all their time in a secluded area or in a locked up basement, and then EUREKA, here is Cubase 8! Nope, Cubase is above all user influenced. Turing it into the best of DAWs for MY USE, and for many with me. I hope that even there is a handfull of you, there are zillions of users that are satisfied with it the way it is.
Mac Pro - Maverics 3,2Ghz - 20GB RAM - 22TB Disc, Cubase 8,5 + 4.5 (on PC/XP), Wavelab 9, iPad Remote, RME Hammerfall RAYDAT, Yamaha01V96, and a bucket of ice cream.

User avatar
MattiasNYC
Grand Senior Member
Posts: 3968
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 9:27 am
Contact:

Re: Why people are moving away from Cubase

Post by MattiasNYC » Sun Oct 09, 2016 3:59 pm

trashdinner wrote:I work in the video game industry and I've noticed that A LOT of people are moving away from Cubase.
Probably pretty hard to actually quantify that in an accurate way though.
trashdinner wrote:We're talking about sound designers, composers, audio mixers and post prod guys.
I'd argue that Nuendo is the better app at least for post production and mixing, and possibly also sound design. So if people are moving away from Cubase I'd expect a fair amount of them to move to Nuendo instead.
trashdinner wrote:They use Pro tools since Nuendo is stupidly expensive
Please don't tell me that you think Nuendo is "stupidly expensive" and Pro Tools is cheaper!? That'd be the funniest thing since Adam Sandler...
trashdinner wrote: and pro tools does this perfectly.
Pro Tools do many things perfectly, some things poorly, and some things it doesn't do at all. Nuendo has better import/export with WWISE for example, and PT doesn't have that at all. Nuendo has Control Room, and PT doesn't have that at all (yet). Nuendo has a EDL re-conform function, PT does not. Nuendo has Media Bay, PT does not have an equivalent. And so on. You can compare the two and find differences, but as to which are actually important and time/money saving that's a different issue. You'd really have to sit down and list it all and tally it up.

Every single professional studio I've worked in in New York has had PT HD, with either TDM or HDX (or the latest native). All of them (post studios) have also had Sound Miner for asset management, but that's obviously limited in terms of what assets are managed compared to Media Bay, not to mention a far less tight integration. They also almost always have a third party hardware monitor controller as opposed to Nuendo's Control Room. And so right there you're looking at the cost of PT HD + SoundMiner + Monitor Controller (StudioComm, Dangerous etc) versus Nuendo. You can't say with a straight face that Nuendo is "stupidly expensive" compared to that.
trashdinner wrote:Steiny could easily bring that feature to Cubase or lower Nuendo's price of 800$ :/
Sure they could. They could also give away Cubase and lower Nuendo's price to $199. They could do a lot of things. The question is what's reasonable.
trashdinner wrote:Most of the sound designers are now using Reaper because of how easy and fast it is to batch export multiple clips even if they are on the same track. Most of them will often have many sounds in one session and they want to export them all easily while keeping their exact lengh ect. Reaper does that in a breeze.
100 bucks says that the primary reason they're using Reaper is because a bunch of them are working from home and don't want to spend the money. Quite frankly I don't disagree with that decision. If Reaper does what you want, the way you want it, as fast as you want it to, and it's the cheapest option, then there's absolutely zero reason to get something else. For a lot of us though the needs aren't met by Reaper though.

Having said all of that I don't disagree that there are things Steinberg needs to address, and I wouldn't be against giving Cubase users edit mode or whatever it's called.
Nuendo 7.1.4 / Lynx TWO-B / Windows 10 Pro 64-bit / Ryzen 1700 3.7GHz (oc) / 16GB Corsair Vengeance DDR4@3200MHz / Radeon VII / ASUS x370-A mobo/ 500GB WD Blue system drive / Crucial BX100 250GB SSD media / spinners for library/backup ::::: iZotope RX 7/ Phoenixverb Surround / DaVinci Resolve / Faderport / Applied Acoustics UltraAnalog / my pet pony Frank

User avatar
Raphie
Senior Member
Posts: 1326
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 5:20 pm
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Why people are moving away from Cubase

Post by Raphie » Sun Oct 09, 2016 4:09 pm

If you like Ableton, buy Ableton. it would be a stab in the back if Steinberg gave in to that clip based hipster crap called Live....
Last edited by Raphie on Sun Oct 09, 2016 4:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Analogue Mastering
MSI raider X299 - Intel i9 7940 - MSI Gaming X 1070GTX 8GB - SAMSUNG 970 PRO 1TB - OCZ RD400 nvme SSD - 32gB DDR4-4400
Windows 10 x64 1909 - Cubase Pro 10.5x - Wavelab Pro 10.x
RME MadiFX and racks full of outboard

Everything you need to know about remote control editors

trashdinner
Member
Posts: 212
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: Why people are moving away from Cubase

Post by trashdinner » Sun Oct 09, 2016 4:33 pm

Fabio Bartolini wrote:I'll be brief. I don't mean to sound rude, it's just sunday :-)

1. Off topic, moving to the Lounge

2. We had a lot of people moving TO Cubase, especially Pro 8.5 (and Nuendo 7, in the game industry). Figures varies a lot form country to country, though, the user's relative perception as well

3. We entered roughly 20000 issues / requests / improvement tasks for the Cubase Pro 8 / 8.5 line alone - seeing that this is perceived as 'ignoring' is kind of sad, although we know that the user don't -and can't- know how much work developers, planners, testers and support as well have to deal with. Still, we do understand that every user has different requirements and what has been done may be great to some and poor to others.
Thanks for the reply Fabio I appreciate it! I know you're looking at popularity and what features people request the most and all but I'm just stating what I see at work and I think it's unfortunate since Cubase is still my favorite DAW and it surpasses any other DAW in a lot of ways. There are certain features that are big enough to make them switch and I can't blame them since we have a lot of work and efficiency/speed is the key.

What I meant by "ignoring" was about how DSP hungry Cubase was and the Edit Mode confusion that happened when it was in Cubase but suddenly removed and now we have to pay 1800$ to get it :/ I read those thread about Edit Mode and a lot of ppl want it back. The video team and post prod audio guys are trying to all use the same DAW and Pro tools is the winner only because of edit mode and the price point.

I'm sure they would use Nuendo if they could, but the company won't pay that kind of price for the whole team. There's a hole between Cubase and Nuendo when it comes to post prod and video and pro tools fills it unfortunately.

I also don't see how this thread was off topic in the General section but I guess you perceived it like bad press so it's better to put it in the lounge.

User avatar
Fabio Bartolini
Moderator
Posts: 1347
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:55 am
Contact:

Re: Why people are moving away from Cubase

Post by Fabio Bartolini » Sun Oct 09, 2016 6:33 pm

Hello,

thanks for posting back. I see what you mean about the Edit Mode and can only say I would never like to see features removed from a new version.

About Cubase being more intensive, support is all ears to spot any specific issue. We also test other DAWs and the performance is quite even under all of our testing conditions. I'm not excluding that under specific conditions Cubase might perform worse that others (or better, that is), but without knowing what those conditions are, no one will ever understand why.
Specifically to Reaper, I tested several projects in the past (a very generic audio test pretty recently: viewtopic.php?f=226&t=93206#p519220) and never saw such differences - so, it would be interesting indeed to know which kind of projects you work on and what other software you use. I for one, do exclusively audio mixes with loads of FX, but 5 to 10 VSTi per project, which is most probably radically different to what you do. I'm particularly interested in performance and stability, and would gladly try to understand why you see such degraded performance.
Fabio Bartolini - Test Engineer
Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH
Hamburg, Germany

PC1: Gigabyte Z390 Gaming X, i7-8700K, 16GB Corsair DDR4 2666MHz, Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+ 8GB, Windows 10 Pro
PC2: GA-Z170-Gaming K3, i7-6700K, 16GB Corsair DDR4 2133MHz, ASUS Dual GTX 1060 6GB, Windows 10 (8.1 and 7 Pro backwards comp.)
PC3: GA-H97-HD3, i5-4690K, 16GB Corsair DDR3 1600MHz, Sapphire RX 570 Pulse 4GB, Windows 10 Pro (7 Pro backwards comp.)
Office DAW 1: GA-X570 Gaming X, Ryzen 7 3700X, 16GB HyperX DDR4 3200MHz, Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB, Windows 10 Pro
Office DAW 2: Mac Mini 2018, i7 3.2 GHz, 32GB DDR4, Intel HD 630, MacOS Catalina

User avatar
Fabio Bartolini
Moderator
Posts: 1347
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:55 am
Contact:

Re: Why people are moving away from Cubase

Post by Fabio Bartolini » Sun Oct 09, 2016 6:39 pm

trashdinner wrote: I also don't see how this thread was off topic in the General section but I guess you perceived it like bad press so it's better to put it in the lounge.
No, I'm not that cynical or smart in a PR meaning. But seeing how 'the plea thread', which is much more off-topic than this, is still lingering in General, then this can can fit there as well. Moved again :o
Fabio Bartolini - Test Engineer
Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH
Hamburg, Germany

PC1: Gigabyte Z390 Gaming X, i7-8700K, 16GB Corsair DDR4 2666MHz, Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+ 8GB, Windows 10 Pro
PC2: GA-Z170-Gaming K3, i7-6700K, 16GB Corsair DDR4 2133MHz, ASUS Dual GTX 1060 6GB, Windows 10 (8.1 and 7 Pro backwards comp.)
PC3: GA-H97-HD3, i5-4690K, 16GB Corsair DDR3 1600MHz, Sapphire RX 570 Pulse 4GB, Windows 10 Pro (7 Pro backwards comp.)
Office DAW 1: GA-X570 Gaming X, Ryzen 7 3700X, 16GB HyperX DDR4 3200MHz, Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB, Windows 10 Pro
Office DAW 2: Mac Mini 2018, i7 3.2 GHz, 32GB DDR4, Intel HD 630, MacOS Catalina

-steve-
External Moderator
Posts: 9249
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 7:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Why people are moving away from Cubase

Post by -steve- » Sun Oct 09, 2016 7:16 pm

The takeaway from threads like this (those that start with an unproved premise) is that all you have to do is type something in order to create the appearance of a valid statement.

The posting of a phrase such as "The earth is flat" gets the same prominence as "The earth is round", regardless of its accuracy. Then, others post agreeing or disagreeing and some of these participants presume that a consensus has been reached. This assertion becomes a presumption which is used to buoy one side or another- both in the starting thread, and in others, by way of citation, and then we see statements like 90% of <blank> say <blank>, making an, well, click me, because I can't say it here ;)
independent manufacturer rep (not a Steinberg employee, and I do not speak for them)
cubase pro, nuendo, and dorico pro; latest versions
windows pro 10 | i7-3770k | ga-77x-ud5h | 32 Gb | UR44C | hp spectre x360 2018 | 16 Gb

User avatar
MrSoundman
Senior Member
Posts: 2451
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 3:27 am
Contact:

Re: Why people are moving away from Cubase

Post by MrSoundman » Sun Oct 09, 2016 10:23 pm

SteveInChicago wrote:all you have to do is type something in order to create the appearance of a valid statement
Welcome to the internet ....
Windows 10 • Cubase 10.5.12 • WaveLab 10.0.20 • SpectraLayers 6.0.30 • HALion 6.3.1 • Groove Agent 5.0.20 • Midex

User avatar
Mrhehon
Member
Posts: 334
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 2:02 am
Location: Valencia Spain.
Contact:

Re: Why people are moving away from Cubase

Post by Mrhehon » Sun Oct 09, 2016 10:39 pm

I thought to make it a valid statement you have to type "Fact".
Windows 10 pro
Cubase Pro 10
PC i7 920@2.67 GHz (10 years old but still doing it for me) 16GB ram
2xMR816 CSX FireWire Audio Interfaces
CC121 controller
Nektar P6

User avatar
greggybud
Senior Member
Posts: 1273
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 10:01 am
Contact:

Re: Why people are moving away from Cubase

Post by greggybud » Mon Oct 10, 2016 12:18 am

SteveInChicago wrote:The takeaway from threads like this (those that start with an unproved premise) is that all you have to do is type something in order to create the appearance of a valid statement.
State your credentials, then name just about everyone....composers, mixers sound design, post prod, just about everyone but the lowly "hobbyist" or prosumer who IMO are actually in the drivers seat for any DAW that exists today including PT. The "professionals" are often at the prosumers mercy because the money is with the prosumers not every day studio users.

And never ever use any data to back any claim of course. :D

FWIW, AOT has never been a big issue for myself, I'm just a poor sap who uses Cubase about every day since the late 90s. The reason is that I use C8.5 on 4 21 inch monitors controlled by an IconPro so real estate isn't as important as the user on a small laptop.

But do you care to know what problem is huge to me because I work with 4 video monitors? To this day there is no way to focus any mix console, or various windows other than ctr+tab cycling through the windows. Another huge problem for myself is the lack of key commands and unfinished functions that contribute to some huge overall consistency problems that don't exist in PT. Fast workflow and attention to detail with the core DAW functions is hugely important for me. While some users value the DAW tools that are included in Cubase, I'm mostly happy to just use just 3rd party tools and wouldn't miss them if they vanished tomorrow. But I know that won't happen because prosumers are in the drivers seat.

I totally understand why AOT is huge to others. It seems to me it should have been fixed by now.

As said previously in this thread, there so are many different users, hence a lot of different feature requests. Cubase is the most feature-rich DAW available. That is a blessing and a curse. One bug might be huge to you, but low priority for someone else. The goal I hope is to identify and address the most common feature requests and the most common and major bugs.
Windows 10 64bit, Wavelab 9.5, latest Cubase version, 64 gig all drives SSD,s (Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050ti driving 2 34" LG ultra wides and 1 28" all @2560x1080) iCon QconPro, Metagrid, 4 MidiTimePiece's = 32in/outs,, UAD-2, NI, Waves, Arturia, and lots of hardware synthesizers most of them controlled by MidiQuest 11.

karlito
Junior Member
Posts: 134
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 6:38 am
Contact:

Re: Why people are moving away from Cubase

Post by karlito » Mon Oct 10, 2016 1:14 am

Fabio Bartolini wrote:
3. We entered roughly 20000 issues / requests / improvement tasks for the Cubase Pro 8 / 8.5 line alone - seeing that this is perceived as 'ignoring' is kind of sad, although we know that the user don't -and can't- know how much work developers, planners, testers and support as well have to deal with. Still, we do understand that every user has different requirements and what has been done may be great to some and poor to others.
I am not sure I understand what you mean by "entered" since it's the users who submitted these countless bug reports, requests and suggestions, and the fact that they're listed in a forum does not mean Steinberg acted or will act on them, or that they have even been acknowledged. How would we know that we are not being ignored?

The fact that simple bugs like, for example, BON-16608 introduced in 8.5.10 are still present 8 months later, and not even knowing if these are going to be fixed before the next paid update has really made a lot of us look for alternatives.
Simple options to turn mixer AOT back on, or to disable the border popups menus or the new time ruler and cursor changes? Nothing.
Just stating once or twice a year that this or the other issue is being looked at may be reassuring for awhile, but then years go by and we hear nothing back.
We're talking about simple stuff here, not RnD heavy projects. Very simple tasks.

After a relatively short transition period I have found my DAW alternative. There still are things about Cubase that I will miss and I might get back to it in the future if I see Steinberg changing gears. Until then no more cash from me.
Censored signature.

trashdinner
Member
Posts: 212
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 1:43 am
Contact:

Re: Why people are moving away from Cubase

Post by trashdinner » Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:07 am

Fabio Bartolini wrote:Hello,

thanks for posting back. I see what you mean about the Edit Mode and can only say I would never like to see features removed from a new version.

About Cubase being more intensive, support is all ears to spot any specific issue. We also test other DAWs and the performance is quite even under all of our testing conditions. I'm not excluding that under specific conditions Cubase might perform worse that others (or better, that is), but without knowing what those conditions are, no one will ever understand why.
Specifically to Reaper, I tested several projects in the past (a very generic audio test pretty recently: viewtopic.php?f=226&t=93206#p519220) and never saw such differences - so, it would be interesting indeed to know which kind of projects you work on and what other software you use. I for one, do exclusively audio mixes with loads of FX, but 5 to 10 VSTi per project, which is most probably radically different to what you do. I'm particularly interested in performance and stability, and would gladly try to understand why you see such degraded performance.
Hi Fabio, thanks again for replying. I'm sorry this thread turned into a negative thread ... that's not what I wanted even if it was bound to happen.

to be more specific about the points I brought up, the batch export/convert feature of Reaper is extremely fast and powerful when it comes to extracting every single clips in a session. You select any audio/midi clips, you open the batch export menu, you chose what format you want and it will convert/export around 10 clips (with or without effects) in 2 sec. From what I understand, most of the sound designer I work with design their sounds over the animations. They either use a video track with all the animations one after another and design the sounds to match them, or they do sound design for a trailer which is similar. They often end up with 100 clips in their session and they want to export them all without wasting too much time. you can see how fast reaper is at that specific task in this video at 4:10 : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsTlp1-qhrI
A sound designer also told me that the way you can load separate plugins on clips directly and tweak them ect is amazing for what they do since they don't need to create new tracks every time they need different effects.

About the performance, we just loaded plugins while watching the meter with CPU load until it would either max out or crash. Reaper tends to crash when too many plugins are loaded but the max amount was significantly higher in Reaper. TBH we didn't really do other tests so Cubase might be better in different situations, but it convinced some guys to make the jump :/

When it comes to post prod and video (I'm in that team btw), if you could just bring back edit mode in Cubase, pro tools will be useless.
Also, having an option to split stereo tracks to dual mono when exporting OMF would be great! We have to provide the video team with OMF but some DAW and video software won't support stereo tracks in OMF for some reasons. I'm talking for my team right now but I'm sure a lot of people are still using OMF and would like that little feature. (it's in the export to AAF of Nuendo btw). Thanks again and have a great week!

User avatar
Fabio Bartolini
Moderator
Posts: 1347
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:55 am
Contact:

Re: Why people are moving away from Cubase

Post by Fabio Bartolini » Mon Oct 10, 2016 8:07 am

HI trashdinner,

I'll bring the Edit Mode topic up. FRs can be posted in the Forum (where especially Guillermo browses and forwards the requests) or sent via a MySteinberg support request. About performance, if you think there is anything to check, I'm always interested in this - you can send an e-mail to my attention or PM for further info.

@Karlito: Issues posted on the forum do no enter the bug base on their own, it takes someone to reproduce and create the official issue. And quite some are found and entered by either us or QA, the beta testers or even the devs themselves before the users report. BON-16608 is part of a bigger hover improvement task; according to the system, it's in 8.5.30.
Fabio Bartolini - Test Engineer
Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH
Hamburg, Germany

PC1: Gigabyte Z390 Gaming X, i7-8700K, 16GB Corsair DDR4 2666MHz, Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+ 8GB, Windows 10 Pro
PC2: GA-Z170-Gaming K3, i7-6700K, 16GB Corsair DDR4 2133MHz, ASUS Dual GTX 1060 6GB, Windows 10 (8.1 and 7 Pro backwards comp.)
PC3: GA-H97-HD3, i5-4690K, 16GB Corsair DDR3 1600MHz, Sapphire RX 570 Pulse 4GB, Windows 10 Pro (7 Pro backwards comp.)
Office DAW 1: GA-X570 Gaming X, Ryzen 7 3700X, 16GB HyperX DDR4 3200MHz, Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB, Windows 10 Pro
Office DAW 2: Mac Mini 2018, i7 3.2 GHz, 32GB DDR4, Intel HD 630, MacOS Catalina

Puma0382
Senior Member
Posts: 1853
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:11 pm
Contact:

Re: Why people are moving away from Cubase

Post by Puma0382 » Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:53 am

Fabio Bartolini wrote: BON-16608 is part of a bigger hover improvement task; according to the system, it's in 8.5.30.
Nice - a little update coming before the usual year-end major version update... :mrgreen:

BTW - thanks for your input on this thread Fabio; good reading

Bob
System 1:- Win10 64bit, Gigabyte H81M m/board, Intel i7 4790 3.6Ghz, 16Gb RAM, NVIDIA GTX 750 Ti, 2 x 22" HD monitors; Steinberg UR44; Cubase Pro v10.5.12, WaveLab Pro v10.0.20, Studio One v4.6.1, Dorico Elements v3.1, Addictive Drums 2, Komplete 12, StylusRMX

System 2:- Win10 32bit, Q6600 2.4 Ghz, 4Gb RAM, NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS, Delta 1010LT; Cubase Pro v8.0.40, WaveLab Pro v9.1.0, Komplete10, StylusRMX

-steve-
External Moderator
Posts: 9249
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 7:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Why people are moving away from Cubase

Post by -steve- » Mon Oct 10, 2016 1:55 pm

Fabio Bartolini wrote: I'll bring the Edit Mode topic up.
The Nuendo-exclusive Edit Mode has been being requested for years in Cubase, and was even present (by mistake) for a moment. It was removed then, and that would appear to be an unambiguous message about where SB thinks it belongs.

Adding it to Cubase would be a huge positive for users. Nuendo has so much more going for it than it had years ago- ADR, loudness stats, Conforming, which makes Edit Mode less crucial as a value adding feature now, compared to before these newer features were present.
independent manufacturer rep (not a Steinberg employee, and I do not speak for them)
cubase pro, nuendo, and dorico pro; latest versions
windows pro 10 | i7-3770k | ga-77x-ud5h | 32 Gb | UR44C | hp spectre x360 2018 | 16 Gb

Locked

Return to “Steinberg Lounge”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests