Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

For users of legacy Steinberg Cubase software
Ivochkin
Junior Member
Posts: 71
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 11:25 pm
Contact:

Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

Post by Ivochkin » Mon Jan 21, 2013 2:13 pm

Hello, i want to ask why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more CPU hungry than Cubase 6.5?. I have some projects that have been made with Cubase 6.5 with 80% CPU load. But when i open the same projects, on the same computer, in Cubase 7, i can't play them, because CPU load goes to 100% ! This is ridiculous. Steinberg, please, provide better CPU usage optimisations for Cubase 7. I don't want to buy new CPU every time i upgrade my Cubase.
MacBook Pro 15 - 2016 touchbar

User avatar
The dman
Member
Posts: 360
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:13 pm
Contact:

Re: Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

Post by The dman » Mon Jan 21, 2013 2:26 pm

The performance from 6.5 to 7 is about the same for me.

Mac or PC?
Cubase 8.5.15 x64 Windows 10 Home
ASUS P8Z68-V GEN3/ i72600k / G.SKILL Ripjaw (4 x 4GB)/SeaSonic X750 Gold PSU/ RME HDSP 9652 / UAD2Quad// Alphatrack/ Alesis HD24XR

http://www.woodstockschoolofmusic.com/

http://www.davedaltonmusic.com

Ivochkin
Junior Member
Posts: 71
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 11:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

Post by Ivochkin » Mon Jan 21, 2013 2:55 pm

PC. win 7 64bit, RME HDSPe audiointerface. Cubase 6.5.4 x64 and Cub 7.01 x64
MacBook Pro 15 - 2016 touchbar

User avatar
HarrySound
Member
Posts: 251
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

Post by HarrySound » Mon Jan 21, 2013 2:58 pm

The fact it was hungrier for CPU power was stated in some information you should have read before purchase.
I did....I knew what Problems I was potentially letting myself in for and decided the gains were worth it....
I have to say I kinda prefer 6.5
The mixer in 7 looks out of place, the whole thi looks a little messy.

Frozenwave
Junior Member
Posts: 132
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 6:28 pm

Re: Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

Post by Frozenwave » Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:30 pm

I can't confirm this. I tested this in very detail. Cubase 7 does not generally use more cpu power.

User avatar
cmaffia
Member
Posts: 577
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Queens, New York
Contact:

Re: Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

Post by cmaffia » Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:45 pm

Sounds like I was wise to stay where I am (6.5.3) until things improve.
2 Cascaded Tascam DM3200's - IF-FW/DMMKII - IF-AN/DM - Tascam DA-3000 Mastering Recorder - Apogee Rosetta 200 - Cubase 9.0.30 - Sweetwater Creation Station 400 - i7-3770, 3.4GHz Quad Core - 8GB RAM - Windows 7 & 10 Home - UAD-2 Solo - UAD-2 Duo - Steinberg CC121 - 2 x Frontier Tranzport - Wavelab 9 32/64-Bit

Bandcamp: The Sweats
Check out The Bastudio

Guest

Re: Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

Post by Guest » Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:58 pm

nope im finding c7 is using less cpu , in 6.5 if i was using 60 % of the cpu i'll open up the same project in c7 and im using 40% which is a remarkable difference and this is with every project with the same buffer sizes so i can't reproduce your issues either sorry

emotive
Member
Posts: 583
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 12:08 am

Re: Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

Post by emotive » Mon Jan 21, 2013 4:01 pm

These problems are normally associated with windows services, and if an internet is involved, the network.

What services and/or programs are starting with the Operating System?

Are Background Services enabled in Advanced System Settings?

vanhaze2000
Junior Member
Posts: 80
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 3:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

Post by vanhaze2000 » Mon Jan 21, 2013 4:40 pm

I am on Mac (10.8.2).

Would like to know from other mac users how they experience any cpu performance difference between C6 and C7.
Macbook CoreI7 / 8 gig RAM OSX 10.8.4 / Cubase 7.05 / HALion 5 / Maschine MKII / Novation Impulse / MOTU 2408 MKIII

johngar
Member
Posts: 563
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

Post by johngar » Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:07 pm

The tests I have done on PC (see specs below) with same project. 15 instances of a VSTi. With ASIO Gaurd ON in Cubase7.

Cubase 6.5
CPU = 15%
ASIO Performance meter = 12% (approx)


Cubase 7
CPU = 18%
ASIO Performance meter = <20% (approx)
PC | Nuendo 8 | Cubase 8 | i7-4930k | Win10 | 32gb ram | Intensity Pro | Radeon HD7700 | RME9632 | Euphonix MC Control -Mix - Transport | Genelec |

MacBook Pro 2.2Ghz i7 | OS X 10.9 | MOTU 828MKII |

artifactdetroit.com

Pete
Junior Member
Posts: 109
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 9:11 pm
Contact:

Re: Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

Post by Pete » Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:10 pm

vanhaze2000 wrote:I am on Mac (10.8.2).

Would like to know from other mac users how they experience any cpu performance difference between C6 and C7.
vanhaze2000 wrote:I am on Mac (10.8.2).

Would like to know from other mac users how they experience any cpu performance difference between C6 and C7.
I made a little test. Just running the same song in 7.01 and 6.5. ASIO Guard on. Started the song in C7.

In C6 the cpu usage went up from 255% to 265%
The numper of threads used went down from 121 to 96.
The RAM usage went down from 1.25 gig to 1.0.

So C7 uses a little less CPU. Is better at hyper threading. And uses a little more RAM.

I read the result as good news for Mac users. And C 7.01 is rock solid.
Sweden
MacPro 2.8. 10 gig Ram. OS 10.9.2, MacBookPro, 2x MH ULN-2 2D +DSP, Focusrite OctoPre, MOTU midi express XT, Roland keyboard, JV1080, Cubase7, LogicProX, DSP-Quattro, Sibelius 7, NI Komplete, FabFilter, PSP, OhmForce, Aether, AltiVerb, AutoTune, Melodyne. Cubase IC Pro

chimpspanner
Junior Member
Posts: 152
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 9:49 pm
Contact:

Re: Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

Post by chimpspanner » Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:04 pm

I'm not sure if Cubase 7 actually uses more CPU or is just better at reporting the actual usage (now that it has an average and a peak bar) but I felt this was the case too. It feels like my system has a little less headroom than it did before. That said, it is pretty solid.

Also I was forced to do a complete reinstall today as my setup had some other issues so I took the opportunity to go all out 64-bit. Will be interesting to see how it performs on a fresh install :)
http://www.paulortizmusic.com

HP Envy J130ea | i7 4700MQ | 12GB RAM | 2GB GeForce 740m | Win 10 64-bit | Cubase Pro 8.5

Keith99
Member
Posts: 409
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

Post by Keith99 » Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:38 pm

I love Cubase 7 and would never go back to an earlier version but I have to say it is more CPU hungry, certainly projects on the edge in 6.5 are now over the edge in 7

User avatar
Rumdrum
Member
Posts: 538
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 1:08 am
Contact:

Re: Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

Post by Rumdrum » Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:47 pm

My experience on a Mac is similar to Pete from Sweden CB7 is less CPU hungry and slightly more memory hungry. Perhaps it is the Scandinavian climate.
Mac Pro - Maverics 3,2Ghz - 20GB RAM - 22TB Disc, Cubase 8,5 + 4.5 (on PC/XP), Wavelab 9, iPad Remote, RME Hammerfall RAYDAT, Yamaha01V96, and a bucket of ice cream.

Mikael
Junior Member
Posts: 98
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 7:22 pm
Contact:

Re: Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

Post by Mikael » Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:18 am

I can confirm the observation that ASIO Performance with C7 is clearly worse than with C6.5.

We are running 2 different systems for live Performance mixing "on edge", as Keith99 would put it... both Windows 64 bit, rme HDSPe Hardware. The Projects are huge, lowest latency (64 samples / 5.4ms measured roundtrip latency) is critical for us, so bottom line is a hell of a cpu load.

With C 6.5, those machines run at their limit but rock solid. Never a crack (and we can't afford any).

WIth 7.0 and 7.0.1, we cannot run those Projects anymore. It is not so much about what the cpu meter reads. Actually, cpu usage in Windows task manager is even a bit lower somweimes with C7 - but ASIO Performance is definitely worse. We get cracks immediately with C7.

These findings are Independent of ASIO Guard on/off, and are the same under W7 and W8 on our machines. We tested both.

Regards, Mikael
SW: C 9.5 /64 & Wavelab 9 on W10/64
DAW 1: DA-X Extreme Haswell-E Xeon E5-2680V3 12-core workstation
DAW 2: Dell Precision T5500 2 x Xeon X5690 12-core workstation
Audio: 4 x rme HDSPe / Multiface II, 3 x Octamic II, 1 x rme Fireface UC
Surface: 3 x Avid MC Mix, 1 x MC Transport
Plugins: Audioease, Lexicon, Neve Portico, Yamaha Vintage, SlateDigital, Izotope, Pianoteq etc.

CWS
Junior Member
Posts: 189
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 3:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

Post by CWS » Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:37 am

I'm running 7.01 here and it is running more stable for me than 6.5 did. A few songs that were pushing the limit on 6.5 are now running below 50% with asio guard on. One thing to make sure of is that you have asio guard enabled in the plug in information. I noticed some plugins were not automatically check marked for asio guard enabled.
Windows 10 Professional 64 bit
Cubase 10 Pro
Intel Core i7-8700K
32 GB Ram
ASRock Z370 Gaming K6 MB
USB 3.0/Firewire
AMD Radeon RX 560
Presonus FireStudio
2- Samsung M.2 SSD

IvanTrend
New Member
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 1:22 pm
Contact:

Re: Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

Post by IvanTrend » Tue Jan 22, 2013 11:36 am

confirm: cubase 7.0.1 has a worse performance of cubase 6.5! Steinberg engineers should work on this very important point! I have a powerful computer! What should I use for cubase 7.0.1??
Windows7 64bit
Quad core Intel I7 144 mhz
16G. ram
Cubase (7) 64bit

emotive
Member
Posts: 583
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 12:08 am

Re: Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

Post by emotive » Tue Jan 22, 2013 11:43 am

IvanTrend wrote:What should I use for cubase 7.0.1??
Do you have background services configured for the workstation?

Ivochkin
Junior Member
Posts: 71
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 11:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

Post by Ivochkin » Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:14 pm

I don't think backround services are important since performance reduce happens only during changing daw version. Here is clear example of what i'm talking about:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/rxasxorl2gnu02g/example1.png
https://www.dropbox.com/s/t383z7fyi8kathb/example2.png

This are screenshots of the same project opened in Cubase 6.5.4 x64 and then in cubase 7.0.1 x64

This project was made one week ago in Cubase 6.5.4.

My system: Windows 7 Pro x64, Intel Core i7 2700K 16 gb RAM, 512 Intel SSD drive, RME HDSPe audiointerface.
Plugins used in the project: Waves Mercury r9.8, T-Racks CS Grand 4.0, Izotope Stutter, Lexicon Total Bundle, Voxengo Gliss EQ, DMGAudio Equality and Compassion (all plugins are x64 bit version).

I definitly want steinberg to comment this. I want to know if they are going to change this situation with CPU overload. Looks like MAC users have different experinece, so this performance drop may be only PC specific. So, waiting for answers.
MacBook Pro 15 - 2016 touchbar

thinkingcap
Grand Senior Member
Posts: 6459
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2010 3:27 pm

Re: Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

Post by thinkingcap » Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:20 pm

Ivochkin wrote:I definitly want steinberg to comment this. I want to know if they are going to change this situation with CPU overload. Looks like MAC users have different experinece, so this performance drop may be only PC specific. So, waiting for answers.
As said before Steinberg already stated that C7 uses more resources than C6...
Cubase 5.1.1 (32bit) | Win 7 Pro x64 SP1 | RME Fireface UFX | RME Fireface 800 | Cubase Essential 5 | Win 7 Home Premium x64
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I just took off my thinkingcap, it got filled up with too much crap...

Ivochkin
Junior Member
Posts: 71
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 11:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

Post by Ivochkin » Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:27 pm

The question is.... Will they optimise CPU usage in future? You may think of it as a feature rquest. I can't understand what is taking so much CPU power since no new C7 features been used in this old cubase version project.
MacBook Pro 15 - 2016 touchbar

IvanTrend
New Member
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 1:22 pm
Contact:

Re: Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

Post by IvanTrend » Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:30 pm

are forced buy computer with 16 cores ! !
cubase is costing me a little too much ....
Windows7 64bit
Quad core Intel I7 144 mhz
16G. ram
Cubase (7) 64bit

IvanTrend
New Member
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 1:22 pm
Contact:

Re: Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

Post by IvanTrend » Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:33 pm

I would like to know what kind of computer should I get to see cubase 7 work great!
Windows7 64bit
Quad core Intel I7 144 mhz
16G. ram
Cubase (7) 64bit

IvanTrend
New Member
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 1:22 pm
Contact:

Re: Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

Post by IvanTrend » Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:34 pm

question: windows 8 will be faster with cubase 7??
Windows7 64bit
Quad core Intel I7 144 mhz
16G. ram
Cubase (7) 64bit

emotive
Member
Posts: 583
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 12:08 am

Re: Why Cubase 7 is aprox 20% more hungry than Cubase 6.5?

Post by emotive » Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:37 pm

IvanTrend wrote:question: windows 8 will be faster with cubase 7??
Yes, but to achieve this, a faster computer may be required however MS ethos is such that the resource footprint should be no more than required for specified functionality to exist (going back to Windows Vista) however in practice to operate a greater number of system processes you will need a faster CPU, more memory, better video card and so on

Post Reply

Return to “Older Cubase versions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests