Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq. ?

General discussions on songwriting, mixing, music business and other music related topics.
User avatar
Muziksculp
Member
Posts: 465
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 5:08 am
Contact:

Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq. ?

Post by Muziksculp » Sun Mar 16, 2014 10:21 pm

Hi.

I just wanted to feel the pulse of Cubase users on this topic.

Q. Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered a Pattern-Based sequencing feature as an additional feature/option ?

My answer is : YES, I would love it if Cubase 8 had a Pattern-Based Sequencing Feature.

Cheers,
Muziksculp
Cubase Pro 9 , Groove Agent 4, Halion 6, Halion Sonic 3, Padshop Pro, RND Portico EQ & Compressor, Wavelab Pro 9, The Grand 3, Antelope Audio Goliath, Antelope Audio Pure2., Windows 8.1 Pro

Woodcrest Studio

Re: Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq

Post by Woodcrest Studio » Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:40 am

what do you mean by pattern based sequencing?

User avatar
curteye
External Moderator
Posts: 4721
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 2:03 am
Contact:

Re: Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq

Post by curteye » Mon Mar 17, 2014 5:12 am

Aloha M,

Do you mean kinda like after all these years building the old pre Cubase;
'Creator/Notator' back into Cubase?

Interesting idea.
{'-'}
If yer gear ain't breakin down, you aint workin' much.

iMac i7 2.8Gz 16GB-10.10x...../C5.5/6.5/7.5/CP8
MBP 3.0Gz......16GB-10.10x.../CP8

Location:
On the side of a volcano in the middle of the Pacific Ocean.

User avatar
Muziksculp
Member
Posts: 465
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 5:08 am
Contact:

Re: Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq

Post by Muziksculp » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:11 am

curteye wrote:Aloha M,

Do you mean kinda like after all these years building the old pre Cubase;
'Creator/Notator' back into Cubase?

Interesting idea.
{'-'}
Yes :idea:

Pattern-Sequencing similar to what Ableton Live, the upcoming Bitwig Studio, and FL Studio 11 offer.

i.e. Building your song by dragging in patterns you assemble, and getting interactive with your ideas as you build and hear your composition develop. When Cubase was a little baby it had this type of functionality. I wonder why they decided to take it out later on when it began to mature ? :)
Cubase Pro 9 , Groove Agent 4, Halion 6, Halion Sonic 3, Padshop Pro, RND Portico EQ & Compressor, Wavelab Pro 9, The Grand 3, Antelope Audio Goliath, Antelope Audio Pure2., Windows 8.1 Pro

User avatar
HowlingUlf
Senior Member
Posts: 2097
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 4:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq

Post by HowlingUlf » Mon Mar 17, 2014 12:36 pm

yeah, group tracks were in Cubase Atari 2.0 and they were so simple, obvious yet extremely powerful and versatile in their own funny way. And you could have Parts playing back from more than one Arrangement window. To this day I haven't seen a better program given the platform and tech specs and I'm amazed what they did with that toy computer!!!

"Build group" was CTRL+U I think :lol:

I've tried to use this allegedly great pattern based Ableton (I have some Lite version I got bundled with some hardware, but a full version is kind of the same in this regard) but it just won't catch fire, it's like driftwood for me. I'm in the state of meaning to try again some day, but I've been there and done that and maybe it's not for me. I'll try again some day, promise haha :oops:

But the Group Tracks in C8 ... !!! 8-)
Gothenburg, Sweden
Steinberg Cubase Pro 9.5.30 | Steinberg WaveLab 9.5 | Steinberg Absolute 2 |
Win10 63.5 Pro | ASUS ATX Z170-P | Intel Core i7-6700K Skylake | 32GB RAM |
Nektar Panorama P6 | | Steinberg Midex8 | Steinberg UR824 |

DG
Member
Posts: 704
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 8:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq

Post by DG » Mon Mar 17, 2014 1:45 pm

I may be rather thick, but I still don't understand what the feature request means. I already build whatever patterns I need. It's called composing. What would this feature do differently?

DG
Nuendo 6.07
Intel Xeon 3.0GHz 10 Core 20 Threads
32GB RAM
Windows 7 (x64)Pro
RME Multiface II
Intensity
nVidia GT 640 graphics card

User avatar
HowlingUlf
Senior Member
Posts: 2097
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 4:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq

Post by HowlingUlf » Mon Mar 17, 2014 2:43 pm

it's kind of like the arranger track but with all of the benefits and then some, and non of the shortcomings.
I guess it's like one of those things somebody can write a book about and not until you see it in action you get it. ;)
Gothenburg, Sweden
Steinberg Cubase Pro 9.5.30 | Steinberg WaveLab 9.5 | Steinberg Absolute 2 |
Win10 63.5 Pro | ASUS ATX Z170-P | Intel Core i7-6700K Skylake | 32GB RAM |
Nektar Panorama P6 | | Steinberg Midex8 | Steinberg UR824 |

User avatar
swamptone
Member
Posts: 758
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 11:19 pm
Location: Upstate New York
Contact:

Re: Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq

Post by swamptone » Mon Mar 17, 2014 3:01 pm

Negative, no, niet, nein, non, nay, nai, nei, nej I do not want that.
formerly known as prism

DG
Member
Posts: 704
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 8:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq

Post by DG » Mon Mar 17, 2014 3:17 pm

HowlingUlf wrote:it's kind of like the arranger track but with all of the benefits and then some, and non of the shortcomings.
I guess it's like one of those things somebody can write a book about and not until you see it in action you get it. ;)
I think you're right. To me the Arranger track is a useless feature. ;)

DG
Nuendo 6.07
Intel Xeon 3.0GHz 10 Core 20 Threads
32GB RAM
Windows 7 (x64)Pro
RME Multiface II
Intensity
nVidia GT 640 graphics card

User avatar
HowlingUlf
Senior Member
Posts: 2097
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 4:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq

Post by HowlingUlf » Mon Mar 17, 2014 3:46 pm

swamptone wrote:Negative, no, niet, nein, non, nay, nai, nei, nej I do not want that.
Aw, c'mon, your enthusiasm is a little lackluster! We'll never get it into C8 with thatspirit! :)
Gothenburg, Sweden
Steinberg Cubase Pro 9.5.30 | Steinberg WaveLab 9.5 | Steinberg Absolute 2 |
Win10 63.5 Pro | ASUS ATX Z170-P | Intel Core i7-6700K Skylake | 32GB RAM |
Nektar Panorama P6 | | Steinberg Midex8 | Steinberg UR824 |

User avatar
AP
Member
Posts: 623
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 11:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq

Post by AP » Mon Mar 17, 2014 5:56 pm

I suggested a VST Groove Box, with lots of patterns like a 303... As for pattern based Sequencing we already have Step Designer & Beat Designer... Which already offer that but I would welcome it if they would offers lots of presets. In other words if you could get the same results as the EDM Tool Box.
Cubase Pro 9.5. 15" MacBook Pro i7, SSD, 16 GB Ram, OS 10.14 UR28M, CMC.

Woodcrest Studio

Re: Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq

Post by Woodcrest Studio » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:56 pm

Oh, OK. I think I got how it works now. I haven't used fruityloops for 10 years! Took me a little to catch on.

I'm indifferent on it. I'm sure it could be a interesting feature, but why not just use Abelton or FL as the gui layout looks totally optimized for this type of workflow?

Rewire it! :mrgreen:

User avatar
HowlingUlf
Senior Member
Posts: 2097
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 4:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq

Post by HowlingUlf » Mon Mar 17, 2014 9:20 pm

Woodcrest Studio wrote:Rewire it! :mrgreen:
Yeah, I've set it up with Rewire. Doesn't mean I like it more, though. It's still Ableton :lol:
Gothenburg, Sweden
Steinberg Cubase Pro 9.5.30 | Steinberg WaveLab 9.5 | Steinberg Absolute 2 |
Win10 63.5 Pro | ASUS ATX Z170-P | Intel Core i7-6700K Skylake | 32GB RAM |
Nektar Panorama P6 | | Steinberg Midex8 | Steinberg UR824 |

User avatar
Muziksculp
Member
Posts: 465
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 5:08 am
Contact:

Re: Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq

Post by Muziksculp » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:12 am

swamptone wrote:Negative, no, niet, nein, non, nay, nai, nei, nej I do not want that.
Why No ?

Pattern-Based Sequencing feature would be an added OPTION/FEATURE to use, if you don't like to use it, go LINEAR and you won't even notice any Pattern-Based Sequencing being present :)

So, I don't see why you are so against it.

I'm all for it !
Cubase Pro 9 , Groove Agent 4, Halion 6, Halion Sonic 3, Padshop Pro, RND Portico EQ & Compressor, Wavelab Pro 9, The Grand 3, Antelope Audio Goliath, Antelope Audio Pure2., Windows 8.1 Pro

User avatar
HowlingUlf
Senior Member
Posts: 2097
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 4:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq

Post by HowlingUlf » Tue Mar 18, 2014 10:20 am

Yeah, it can be done in a non intrusive way with most code already in place? It's not like this need some hi tech audio algorithms nobody has even heard of yet to work either. It's just rearranging code to show stuff in an alternative way.

I'm trying to figure out why I don't think the Arranger Track works as it should on the creative level (my idea of it). I think it's because it's not really pattern based and not really linear but semi linear, maybe? You're still stuck on the time line, only with blocks of music played back. You miss being able to set up your patterns in what ever way you want and then keep layering on top of that.

There's also no way to NOT have a complete section with all the tracks playing back. In the old Cubase Group Tracks you could set up your locators and select the Parts you wanted for a Group, then you build the group of the selected parts. Then you could keep your locators at the same place and build another Group with some Parts which was also in the first group and some parts which were not. So you could have a series of Groups going from simple to complex, then build a song from them by drag and dropping Groups on a Group Track in any order or number of instances you liked.

You could start working in one open Arrangement window and build your groups, then open a new window and insert a Group Track and drag and drop your Groups there. Over that and bellow in the window you could add more actual Tracks to play along with and record on. In a way it was amazingly intuitive and simple to manage and you felt you had absolute control. You could just leave those Parts, Tracks and Groups there (without either urge or need to flatten anything) and that was your Project. And that was in a freakin' Atari! It's also in Cubase VST32, before they turned Cubase into a Nuendo wannabe ...

Comparing the Arranger Track to that level of control and freedom, you are just stuck with those blocks. You can use it in the beginning of a project for mapping out how you want sections to repeat and then flatten that and keep working linearly. The thing is that it's even not really worth the hassle of setting up Arranger Tracks just to flatten your still simple project.

Compared to Ableton Live the old Cubase Group Tracks also had the advantage of not having that "messy other view" where you set up all your parts that I forgot the name of, but I think you access it with the TAB key, knowaddamean? In Cubase it was all in a little overlay list at the right side of the project window, which you could show/hide. All of the other work was done in the main arrangement window, except if you had another arrangement window open. But if you like Ableton you might find that other window the best thing since sliced bread.

"Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq. ?"
Yep!!! 8-)
Gothenburg, Sweden
Steinberg Cubase Pro 9.5.30 | Steinberg WaveLab 9.5 | Steinberg Absolute 2 |
Win10 63.5 Pro | ASUS ATX Z170-P | Intel Core i7-6700K Skylake | 32GB RAM |
Nektar Panorama P6 | | Steinberg Midex8 | Steinberg UR824 |

User avatar
iBM
Member
Posts: 414
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 10:49 am

Re: Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq

Post by iBM » Tue Mar 18, 2014 1:14 pm

swamptone wrote:Negative, no, niet, nein, non, nay, nai, nei, nej I do not want that.
+ 10000000000000000
TSR - Now a division under The Tower Studio Suite - Run by my uncles nephew

Win7/Win8 x64 | Intel i5 2500/3570K | 16 GB RAM | MOTU PCIe-424 w/ 24io x 2 / 2408 / 308
Cubase 6.5/7.5 - Nuendo 5.5 | CC121 | Slate Digital | Softube | Sonnox | SoundToys |
Eventide | Exponential Audio | Boz' Digital Lab | +++
Dynaudio BM15A | Focusrite ISA430 | Universal Audio LA-610SE/2-610/8110 |
TLAudio 5052/C1/PA-1 | TC Electronics R4000/M3000/M-One/D-Two | +++

Woodcrest Studio

Re: Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq

Post by Woodcrest Studio » Tue Mar 18, 2014 1:17 pm

Loopmash super HD

User avatar
HowlingUlf
Senior Member
Posts: 2097
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 4:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq

Post by HowlingUlf » Tue Mar 18, 2014 1:30 pm

Woodcrest Studio wrote:Loopmash super HD
naw, loopmash in this context is a red herring? :?
Gothenburg, Sweden
Steinberg Cubase Pro 9.5.30 | Steinberg WaveLab 9.5 | Steinberg Absolute 2 |
Win10 63.5 Pro | ASUS ATX Z170-P | Intel Core i7-6700K Skylake | 32GB RAM |
Nektar Panorama P6 | | Steinberg Midex8 | Steinberg UR824 |

User avatar
HowlingUlf
Senior Member
Posts: 2097
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 4:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq

Post by HowlingUlf » Tue Mar 18, 2014 1:31 pm

iBM wrote:
swamptone wrote:Negative, no, niet, nein, non, nay, nai, nei, nej I do not want that.
+ 10000000000000000
- 10000000000000001 ;)
Gothenburg, Sweden
Steinberg Cubase Pro 9.5.30 | Steinberg WaveLab 9.5 | Steinberg Absolute 2 |
Win10 63.5 Pro | ASUS ATX Z170-P | Intel Core i7-6700K Skylake | 32GB RAM |
Nektar Panorama P6 | | Steinberg Midex8 | Steinberg UR824 |

Woodcrest Studio

Re: Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq

Post by Woodcrest Studio » Tue Mar 18, 2014 4:20 pm

HowlingUlf wrote:
Woodcrest Studio wrote:Loopmash super HD
naw, loopmash in this context is a red herring? :?
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DopGxUAoAY

User avatar
HowlingUlf
Senior Member
Posts: 2097
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 4:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq

Post by HowlingUlf » Tue Mar 18, 2014 5:06 pm

Woodcrest Studio wrote:
HowlingUlf wrote:
Woodcrest Studio wrote:Loopmash super HD
naw, loopmash in this context is a red herring? :?
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DopGxUAoAY
NI!
Gothenburg, Sweden
Steinberg Cubase Pro 9.5.30 | Steinberg WaveLab 9.5 | Steinberg Absolute 2 |
Win10 63.5 Pro | ASUS ATX Z170-P | Intel Core i7-6700K Skylake | 32GB RAM |
Nektar Panorama P6 | | Steinberg Midex8 | Steinberg UR824 |

UltimateOutsider
Member
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 6:18 am
Contact:

Re: Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq

Post by UltimateOutsider » Tue Mar 18, 2014 5:15 pm

AP wrote:As for pattern based Sequencing we already have Step Designer & Beat Designer
Yeah Beat Designer and StepDesigner have been included with the DAW for ages. They're great.

What would people like to see that's not already possible with these MIDI plugins?

User avatar
swamptone
Member
Posts: 758
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 11:19 pm
Location: Upstate New York
Contact:

Re: Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq

Post by swamptone » Tue Mar 18, 2014 10:17 pm

Muziksculp wrote:
swamptone wrote:Negative, no, niet, nein, non, nay, nai, nei, nej I do not want that.
Why No ?

Pattern-Based Sequencing feature would be an added OPTION/FEATURE to use, if you don't like to use it, go LINEAR and you won't even notice any Pattern-Based Sequencing being present :)

So, I don't see why you are so against it.

I'm all for it !


Just because I'm not for it, doesn't mean I'm against it. The OP question was "Would You Be Happy If ..... ". The proposed feature would not make me happy. I answered the question that was asked (in several languages to avoid ambiguity). Nothing more, and nothing less.
formerly known as prism

User avatar
NorthWood MediaWorks
Senior Member
Posts: 2336
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:51 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq

Post by NorthWood MediaWorks » Mon Mar 24, 2014 7:29 pm

No to the pattern thing, but I'd like to see some improvement in the Cubase step-time interface.... I recall the days of old where I used MOTU performer, its step time methodology was excellent... Steiny could learn from that... its still there in their current product. My 2 cents worth.
Robin
Visit Northwood Mediaworks!
| Cubase Pro 8.5.20 | Wavelab 8.0.3e | HSO | Padshop Pro | Win10pro 64 | i7 16Gb | UR44 | Angry Wife |
| OSX 10.12.6 | MacBookPro Retina 15 | Loads of Other Stuff |

User avatar
jaslan
Grand Senior Member
Posts: 3137
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Would you be happy if Cubase 8 offered Pattern-Based Seq

Post by jaslan » Mon Mar 24, 2014 7:55 pm

I think there are other products that are directly geared toward this. I am not against it, but wouldn't want to pay more for it.
J.L.
Cubase Pro 10. Core-i7 7700HQ, 16GB RAM, Windows 10. UR44. M-Audio Axiom Pro 61. Fishman TriplePlay. Komplete 11 Ultimate. Jamstix 4. Absolute VST3. 418 Carrier Landings.
SoundCloud

Post Reply

Return to “Steinberg Lounge”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests